PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OCIO vs. AMBFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OCIO vs. AMBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearShares OCIO ETF (OCIO) and American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2 (AMBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with OCIO having a 9.94% return and AMBFX slightly lower at 9.80%.


OCIO

1D
0.71%
1M
3.71%
YTD
9.94%
6M
10.68%
1Y
22.20%
3Y*
14.20%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*

AMBFX

1D
0.20%
1M
3.59%
YTD
9.80%
6M
10.73%
1Y
25.43%
3Y*
17.67%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
10.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCIO vs. AMBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OCIO
ClearShares OCIO ETF
9.94%12.68%12.76%12.03%-12.49%13.20%11.54%18.56%-10.35%9.00%
AMBFX
American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2
9.80%18.67%15.25%13.81%-11.93%16.00%11.06%19.45%-2.69%7.50%

Correlation

The correlation between OCIO and AMBFX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2017

0.87

The correlation between OCIO and AMBFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OCIO vs. AMBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCIO
OCIO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
OCIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCIO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
OCIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCIO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

AMBFX
AMBFX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AMBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AMBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCIO vs. AMBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearShares OCIO ETF (OCIO) and American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2 (AMBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OCIOAMBFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.30

2.98

-0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.27

4.17

-0.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.57

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.72

-0.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.08

16.88

-2.79

OCIO vs. AMBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCIO Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the AMBFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCIO and AMBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OCIOAMBFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.98

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.94

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.78

-0.06

Drawdowns

OCIO vs. AMBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCIO drawdown since its inception was -24.21%, smaller than the maximum AMBFX drawdown of -35.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCIO and AMBFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OCIOAMBFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.21%

-35.05%

+10.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.98%

-7.00%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.32%

-10.64%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.75%

-18.65%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.44%

-3.58%

-0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

1.54%

+0.03%

Volatility

OCIO vs. AMBFX - Volatility Comparison

ClearShares OCIO ETF (OCIO) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2 (AMBFX) at 2.67%. This indicates that OCIO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OCIOAMBFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

2.67%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.68%

6.87%

+0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.69%

8.74%

+0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.60%

10.50%

+0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.36%

10.67%

+0.69%

OCIO vs. AMBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OCIO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than AMBFX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

OCIO vs. AMBFX - Dividend Comparison

OCIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.43%, more than AMBFX's 7.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMBFX
American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2
7.74%8.47%7.40%2.20%2.52%4.50%4.56%4.19%6.20%4.85%4.46%5.81%
OCIO
ClearShares OCIO ETF
9.43%10.27%1.87%2.32%3.21%2.83%2.90%2.22%0.01%1.68%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, OCIO and AMBFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

OCIO has higher volatility (3.27%) compared to AMBFX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCIO dropped -24.21% vs AMBFX's -35.05%.

AMBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OCIO and AMBFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer