OBOR vs. KRBN

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

OBOR (KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF) and KRBN (KraneShares Global Carbon ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OBOR is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Global China Infrastructure Exposure, while KRBN is a Commodities fund tracking the IHS Markit Global Carbon Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OBOR returned 1.31%/yr vs 7.53%/yr for KRBN. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

OBOR vs. KRBN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR) and KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OBOR achieves a 4.26% return, which is significantly higher than KRBN's -5.82% return.

OBOR

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: -1.00%
• YTD: 4.26%
• 6M: 7.97%
• 1Y: 24.36%
• 3Y*: 12.00%
• 5Y*: 1.31%
• 10Y*: —

KRBN

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 5.47%
• YTD: -5.82%
• 6M: -0.67%
• 1Y: 16.58%
• 3Y*: 3.50%
• 5Y*: 7.53%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OBOR vs. KRBN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
OBOR KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF	4.26%	27.86%	8.55%	-7.91%	-21.96%	17.06%	25.46%
KRBN KraneShares Global Carbon ETF	-5.82%	23.11%	-13.56%	8.01%	-12.75%	107.69%	22.60%

Correlation

The correlation between OBOR and KRBN is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2020	0.18

OBOR vs. KRBN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OBOR	KRBN
Basic Materials	26.6%	-
Industrials	25.1%	-
Financial Services	23.1%	59.7%
Utilities	14.1%	-
Energy	8.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.4%	-
Healthcare	0.2%	-
Communication Services	0.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

OBOR vs. KRBN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OBOR

OBOR Risk / Return Rank: 42
OBOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
OBOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
OBOR Omega Ratio Rank: 43
OBOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
OBOR Martin Ratio Rank: 38

KRBN

KRBN Risk / Return Rank: 22
KRBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
KRBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
KRBN Omega Ratio Rank: 25
KRBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
KRBN Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OBOR vs. KRBN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR) and KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OBOR	KRBN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	0.88	+0.64
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	1.23	+0.83
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.17	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	0.73	+1.60
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.96	1.91	+4.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OBOR vs. KRBN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OBOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the KRBN Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OBOR and KRBN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OBOR	KRBN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	0.88	+0.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08	0.27	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.57	-0.36

Drawdowns

OBOR vs. KRBN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OBOR drawdown since its inception was -41.54%, which is greater than KRBN's maximum drawdown of -36.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBOR and KRBN.

Drawdown Indicators

	OBOR	KRBN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.54%	-36.42%	-5.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.47%	-24.98%	+14.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.06%	-27.34%	+9.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.00%	-36.42%	+2.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.01%	-14.15%	+6.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.98%	-16.14%	+0.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.08%	9.53%	-5.45%

Volatility

OBOR vs. KRBN - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) at 5.15%. This indicates that OBOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KRBN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OBOR	KRBN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.43%	5.15%	+1.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.80%	16.63%	-2.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.05%	18.97%	-2.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.06%	28.11%	-12.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.52%	28.64%	-10.12%

OBOR vs. KRBN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OBOR and KRBN have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

OBOR vs. KRBN - Dividend Comparison

OBOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than KRBN's 2.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KRBN KraneShares Global Carbon ETF	2.02%	1.90%	7.10%	7.60%	22.91%	0.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OBOR KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF	1.86%	1.94%	3.87%	3.40%	4.75%	3.26%	2.04%	4.33%	0.02%	0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OBOR and KRBN in my portfolio?

OBOR and KRBN have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OBOR or KRBN?

OBOR has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to KRBN (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBOR dropped -41.54% vs KRBN's -36.42%.

Which ETF is better, OBOR or KRBN?

On 5-year performance, KRBN leads with 7.53% vs 1.31% for OBOR. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, KRBN has been the lower-risk option at 5.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OBOR or KRBN?

Over the 5-year period, KRBN has performed better with a 7.53% return vs 1.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OBOR or KRBN?

OBOR and KRBN have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OBOR or KRBN?

KRBN has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 1.86% for OBOR.

What is the main difference between OBOR and KRBN?

OBOR is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while KRBN is Commodities. OBOR tracks MSCI Global China Infrastructure Exposure, while KRBN tracks IHS Markit Global Carbon Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OBOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.