OBIL vs. BNDD
OBIL (US Treasury 12 Month Bill ETF) and BNDD (Quadratic Deflation ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. OBIL is passively managed, while BNDD is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, OBIL returned 4.55%/yr vs -3.91%/yr for BNDD. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OBIL charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for BNDD.
Performance
OBIL vs. BNDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OBIL achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than BNDD's 4.32% return.
OBIL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNDD
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 4.32%
- 6M
- 2.24%
- 1Y
- 3.39%
- 3Y*
- -3.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OBIL vs. BNDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OBIL US Treasury 12 Month Bill ETF | 1.17% | 4.19% | 4.94% | 4.69% | 0.53% |
BNDD Quadratic Deflation ETF | 4.32% | -8.17% | -6.65% | 4.02% | 3.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between OBIL and BNDD is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2022 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OBIL vs. BNDD — Risk / Return Rank
OBIL
BNDD
OBIL vs. BNDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 12 Month Bill ETF (OBIL) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OBIL | BNDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 7.07 | 0.32 | +6.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 16.19 | 0.52 | +15.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.70 | 1.06 | +2.64 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 27.56 | 0.56 | +27.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 150.40 | 1.20 | +149.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OBIL | BNDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.07 | 0.32 | +6.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.38 | -0.33 | +5.70 |
Drawdowns
OBIL vs. BNDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.33%, smaller than the maximum BNDD drawdown of -30.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBIL and BNDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OBIL | BNDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.33% | -30.87% | +30.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.14% | -6.09% | +5.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.21% | -20.75% | +20.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -26.51% | +26.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -19.34% | +19.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | 2.83% | -2.80% |
Volatility
OBIL vs. BNDD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for US Treasury 12 Month Bill ETF (OBIL) is 0.10%, while Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD) has a volatility of 2.21%. This indicates that OBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OBIL | BNDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.10% | 2.21% | -2.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.33% | 8.11% | -7.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54% | 10.59% | -10.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.82% | 13.38% | -12.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.82% | 13.38% | -12.56% |
OBIL vs. BNDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
OBIL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BNDD's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
OBIL vs. BNDD - Dividend Comparison
OBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than BNDD's 3.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDD Quadratic Deflation ETF | 3.61% | 3.82% | 3.85% | 4.30% | 43.17% | 1.04% |
OBIL US Treasury 12 Month Bill ETF | 3.65% | 3.83% | 4.56% | 4.92% | 0.52% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OBIL and BNDD have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNDD has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to OBIL (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBIL dropped -0.33% vs BNDD's -30.87%.
On 3-year performance, OBIL leads with 4.55% vs -3.91% for BNDD. On fees, OBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, OBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, OBIL has performed better with a 4.55% return vs -3.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for BNDD.
OBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 3.61% for BNDD.
They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for OBIL and 1.02% for BNDD.
OBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.07 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OBIL and BNDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer