OAYMX vs. GQHPX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

OAYMX (Oakmark Fund Advisor Class) and GQHPX (GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund) are both mutual funds - OAYMX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Oakmark, while GQHPX is a Quality Factor fund managed by GQG Partners. Over the past 5 years, OAYMX returned 11.31%/yr vs 10.77%/yr for GQHPX. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. OAYMX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for GQHPX.

Performance

OAYMX vs. GQHPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oakmark Fund Advisor Class (OAYMX) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OAYMX achieves a 6.48% return, which is significantly lower than GQHPX's 13.55% return.

OAYMX

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 3.40%
• 6M: 6.43%
• YTD: 6.48%
• 1Y: 17.04%
• 3Y*: 14.48%
• 5Y*: 11.31%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.35%

GQHPX

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: 2.68%
• 6M: 7.38%
• YTD: 13.55%
• 1Y: 16.78%
• 3Y*: 11.65%
• 5Y*: 10.77%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GQHPX GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
OAYMX Oakmark Fund Advisor Class	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

OAYMX vs. GQHPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
OAYMX Oakmark Fund Advisor Class	6.48%	14.35%	16.24%	31.18%	-13.19%	7.27%
GQHPX GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund	13.55%	7.53%	12.69%	3.94%	6.73%	10.34%

Correlation

The correlation between OAYMX and GQHPX is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021	0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between OAYMX and GQHPX has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

OAYMX vs. GQHPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OAYMX

OAYMX Risk / Return Rank: 35
OAYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
OAYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
OAYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
OAYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
OAYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

GQHPX

GQHPX Risk / Return Rank: 62
GQHPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
GQHPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
GQHPX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
GQHPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
GQHPX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OAYMX vs. GQHPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Fund Advisor Class (OAYMX) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OAYMX	GQHPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	1.49	-0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	2.28	-0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.26	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	2.53	-0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.92	6.76	-1.84

OAYMX vs. GQHPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OAYMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the GQHPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OAYMX and GQHPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OAYMX vs. GQHPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OAYMX drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, which is greater than GQHPX's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAYMX and GQHPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	OAYMX	GQHPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.09%	-17.26%	-22.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.94%	-6.50%	-0.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.02%	-8.71%	-8.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.55%	-17.26%	-6.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-1.02%	+0.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.48%	-3.34%	-2.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.80%	2.43%	+0.37%

Volatility

OAYMX vs. GQHPX - Volatility Comparison

Oakmark Fund Advisor Class (OAYMX) has a higher volatility of 4.55% compared to GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX) at 4.32%. This indicates that OAYMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQHPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OAYMX	GQHPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.55%	4.32%	+0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.77%	9.14%	+0.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.55%	11.03%	+2.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.23%	12.74%	+5.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.44%	12.74%	+7.70%

OAYMX vs. GQHPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OAYMX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than GQHPX's 0.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

OAYMX vs. GQHPX - Dividend Comparison

OAYMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than GQHPX's 3.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GQHPX GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund	3.66%	2.98%	3.14%	2.64%	3.24%	0.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OAYMX Oakmark Fund Advisor Class	1.05%	1.12%	1.30%	1.19%	1.16%	1.64%	0.27%	8.44%	8.35%	4.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OAYMX and GQHPX in my portfolio?

OAYMX and GQHPX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OAYMX or GQHPX?

OAYMX has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to GQHPX (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OAYMX dropped -40.09% vs GQHPX's -17.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GQHPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.