PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OAYMX vs. OANCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OAYMX vs. OANCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oakmark Fund Advisor Class (OAYMX) and Oakmark Bond Fund (OANCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OAYMX vs. OANCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
OAYMX
Oakmark Fund Advisor Class
-4.11%14.35%16.24%31.18%-13.19%34.49%30.98%
OANCX
Oakmark Bond Fund
-0.21%7.05%3.19%6.12%-11.36%0.49%5.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OAYMX achieves a -4.11% return, which is significantly lower than OANCX's -0.21% return.


OAYMX

1D
0.40%
1M
-5.35%
YTD
-4.11%
6M
0.53%
1Y
8.36%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
11.05%
10Y*

OANCX

1D
0.53%
1M
-2.01%
YTD
-0.21%
6M
0.87%
1Y
5.27%
3Y*
4.77%
5Y*
1.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OAYMX vs. OANCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OAYMX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than OANCX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

OAYMX vs. OANCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OAYMX
OAYMX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
OAYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OAYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
OAYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
OAYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
OAYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

OANCX
OANCX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
OANCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OANCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
OANCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
OANCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
OANCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OAYMX vs. OANCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Fund Advisor Class (OAYMX) and Oakmark Bond Fund (OANCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OAYMXOANCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.50

1.33

-0.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.82

1.89

-1.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.24

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

1.97

-1.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.21

7.09

-4.88

OAYMX vs. OANCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OAYMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the OANCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OAYMX and OANCX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OAYMXOANCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

1.33

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.21

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.34

+0.27

Correlation

The correlation between OAYMX and OANCX is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

OAYMX vs. OANCX - Dividend Comparison

OAYMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than OANCX's 4.95% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
OAYMX
Oakmark Fund Advisor Class
1.17%1.12%1.30%1.19%1.16%1.64%0.27%8.44%8.35%4.22%
OANCX
Oakmark Bond Fund
4.95%3.76%4.53%3.82%2.97%3.07%1.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

OAYMX vs. OANCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OAYMX drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, which is greater than OANCX's maximum drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAYMX and OANCX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OAYMXOANCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.09%

-15.58%

-24.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.46%

-2.80%

-10.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.55%

-15.58%

-7.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.57%

-2.01%

-4.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.58%

-4.80%

-0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

0.78%

+2.58%

Volatility

OAYMX vs. OANCX - Volatility Comparison

Oakmark Fund Advisor Class (OAYMX) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to Oakmark Bond Fund (OANCX) at 1.51%. This indicates that OAYMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OANCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OAYMXOANCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

1.51%

+2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

2.48%

+7.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.73%

4.07%

+14.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.32%

4.98%

+13.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.66%

4.70%

+15.96%