PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OAYMX vs. OAKMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OAYMX vs. OAKMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oakmark Fund Advisor Class (OAYMX) and Oakmark Fund Investor Class (OAKMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with OAYMX having a -2.23% return and OAKMX slightly lower at -2.30%.


OAYMX

1D
-1.38%
1M
-2.17%
YTD
-2.23%
6M
0.32%
1Y
10.51%
3Y*
14.72%
5Y*
9.18%
10Y*

OAKMX

1D
-1.38%
1M
-2.18%
YTD
-2.30%
6M
0.23%
1Y
10.31%
3Y*
14.50%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
13.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OAYMX vs. OAKMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OAYMX
Oakmark Fund Advisor Class
-2.23%14.35%16.24%31.18%-13.19%34.49%13.02%27.25%-12.66%21.28%
OAKMX
Oakmark Fund Investor Class
-2.30%14.13%16.02%30.92%-13.38%34.85%12.90%27.14%-12.76%21.12%

Correlation

The correlation between OAYMX and OAKMX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2016

1.00

The correlation between OAYMX and OAKMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OAYMX vs. OAKMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OAYMX
OAYMX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
OAYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OAYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
OAYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
OAYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
OAYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

OAKMX
OAKMX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
OAKMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OAKMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
OAKMX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
OAKMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
OAKMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OAYMX vs. OAKMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Fund Advisor Class (OAYMX) and Oakmark Fund Investor Class (OAKMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OAYMXOAKMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.14

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

1.43

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.74

3.64

+0.10

OAYMX vs. OAKMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OAYMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is comparable to the OAKMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OAYMX and OAKMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OAYMXOAKMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

0.76

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.50

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.70

-0.09

Drawdowns

OAYMX vs. OAKMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OAYMX drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, smaller than the maximum OAKMX drawdown of -56.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAYMX and OAKMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OAYMXOAKMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.09%

-56.19%

+16.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.94%

-6.98%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.02%

-17.05%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.55%

-23.68%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.74%

-4.80%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

-6.39%

+0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

2.73%

-0.02%

Volatility

OAYMX vs. OAKMX - Volatility Comparison

Oakmark Fund Advisor Class (OAYMX) and Oakmark Fund Investor Class (OAKMX) have volatilities of 3.21% and 3.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OAYMXOAKMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

3.21%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.44%

9.44%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.08%

13.08%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.28%

18.30%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.52%

20.40%

+0.12%

OAYMX vs. OAKMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OAYMX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than OAKMX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

OAYMX vs. OAKMX - Dividend Comparison

OAYMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than OAKMX's 0.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OAKMX
Oakmark Fund Investor Class
0.94%0.92%1.12%1.02%0.92%1.94%0.17%8.33%8.13%4.06%2.58%1.43%
OAYMX
Oakmark Fund Advisor Class
1.15%1.12%1.30%1.19%1.16%1.64%0.27%8.44%8.35%4.22%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, OAYMX and OAKMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

OAKMX has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to OAYMX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OAYMX dropped -40.09% vs OAKMX's -56.19%.

OAYMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OAYMX and OAKMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer