OAYMX vs. AVERX
OAYMX (Oakmark Fund Advisor Class) and AVERX (Ave Maria Value Focused Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. OAYMX is actively managed, while AVERX is passively managed. Over the past year, OAYMX returned 10.51% vs 19.21% for AVERX. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OAYMX charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for AVERX.
Performance
OAYMX vs. AVERX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OAYMX achieves a -2.23% return, which is significantly lower than AVERX's 18.79% return.
OAYMX
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -2.17%
- YTD
- -2.23%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 10.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.72%
- 5Y*
- 9.18%
- 10Y*
- —
AVERX
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- 18.79%
- 6M
- 17.63%
- 1Y
- 19.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OAYMX vs. AVERX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OAYMX Oakmark Fund Advisor Class | -2.23% | 18.52% |
AVERX Ave Maria Value Focused Fund | 18.79% | 0.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between OAYMX and AVERX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OAYMX vs. AVERX — Risk / Return Rank
OAYMX
AVERX
OAYMX vs. AVERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Fund Advisor Class (OAYMX) and Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OAYMX | AVERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.17 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 1.79 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.74 | 4.23 | -0.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OAYMX | AVERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 0.97 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.92 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
OAYMX vs. AVERX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OAYMX drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, which is greater than AVERX's maximum drawdown of -11.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAYMX and AVERX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OAYMX | AVERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.09% | -11.33% | -28.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.94% | -10.27% | +3.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.74% | -7.58% | +2.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.54% | -5.74% | +0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 4.34% | -1.63% |
Volatility
OAYMX vs. AVERX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Oakmark Fund Advisor Class (OAYMX) is 3.21%, while Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that OAYMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OAYMX | AVERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 4.58% | -1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.44% | 14.75% | -5.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.08% | 19.04% | -5.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.28% | 18.88% | -0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.52% | 18.88% | +1.64% |
OAYMX vs. AVERX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OAYMX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than AVERX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
OAYMX vs. AVERX - Dividend Comparison
OAYMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than AVERX's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVERX Ave Maria Value Focused Fund | 0.34% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OAYMX Oakmark Fund Advisor Class | 1.15% | 1.12% | 1.30% | 1.19% | 1.16% | 1.64% | 0.27% | 8.44% | 8.35% | 4.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OAYMX and AVERX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVERX has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to OAYMX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OAYMX dropped -40.09% vs AVERX's -11.33%.
AVERX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OAYMX and AVERX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer