AVERX vs. MDDAX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AVERX (Ave Maria Value Focused Fund) and MDDAX (MassMutual Diversified Value Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past year, AVERX returned 13.36% vs 26.60% for MDDAX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVERX charges 1.26%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for MDDAX.

Performance

AVERX vs. MDDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX) and MassMutual Diversified Value Fund (MDDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AVERX having a 11.57% return and MDDAX slightly higher at 12.14%.

AVERX

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: -7.97%
• YTD: 11.57%
• 6M: 9.97%
• 1Y: 13.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MDDAX

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 2.75%
• YTD: 12.14%
• 6M: 11.20%
• 1Y: 26.60%
• 3Y*: 18.97%
• 5Y*: 11.81%
• 10Y*: 12.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVERX vs. MDDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AVERX Ave Maria Value Focused Fund	11.57%	0.37%
MDDAX MassMutual Diversified Value Fund	12.14%	19.18%

Correlation

The correlation between AVERX and MDDAX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025	0.51

The correlation between AVERX and MDDAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AVERX vs. MDDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVERX

AVERX Risk / Return Rank: 9
AVERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
AVERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
AVERX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
AVERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
AVERX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

MDDAX

MDDAX Risk / Return Rank: 82
MDDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
MDDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
MDDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
MDDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
MDDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVERX vs. MDDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX) and MassMutual Diversified Value Fund (MDDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVERX	MDDAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.65	2.52	-1.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.01	3.65	-2.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.44	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.97	3.95	-2.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.63	14.05	-11.42

AVERX vs. MDDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVERX Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the MDDAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVERX and MDDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AVERX vs. MDDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVERX drawdown since its inception was -13.20%, smaller than the maximum MDDAX drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVERX and MDDAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVERX	MDDAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.20%	-63.45%	+50.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.20%	-6.99%	-6.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.14%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.00%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.20%	-0.21%	-12.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.91%	-11.14%	+5.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.84%	1.96%	+2.88%

Volatility

AVERX vs. MDDAX - Volatility Comparison

Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to MassMutual Diversified Value Fund (MDDAX) at 3.28%. This indicates that AVERX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVERX	MDDAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.22%	3.28%	+1.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.63%	8.05%	+6.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.54%	10.99%	+8.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.92%	16.93%	+1.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.92%	18.73%	+0.19%

AVERX vs. MDDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVERX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than MDDAX's 1.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVERX vs. MDDAX - Dividend Comparison

AVERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than MDDAX's 28.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AVERX Ave Maria Value Focused Fund	0.37%	0.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MDDAX MassMutual Diversified Value Fund	28.93%	32.44%	40.33%	4.62%	12.85%	12.66%	1.64%	11.68%	18.94%	37.06%	5.94%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVERX and MDDAX in my portfolio?

AVERX and MDDAX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVERX or MDDAX?

AVERX has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to MDDAX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVERX dropped -13.20% vs MDDAX's -63.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MDDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.