OACP vs. CFIT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

OACP (OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF) and CFIT (Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OACP returned 4.76% vs 12.03% for CFIT. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OACP charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for CFIT.

Performance

OACP vs. CFIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) and Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OACP achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than CFIT's 5.95% return.

OACP

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.74%
• YTD: 0.24%
• 6M: 0.53%
• 1Y: 4.76%
• 3Y*: 4.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CFIT

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 1.30%
• YTD: 5.95%
• 6M: 5.55%
• 1Y: 12.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OACP vs. CFIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
OACP OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF	0.24%	5.25%
CFIT Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF	5.95%	3.40%

Correlation

The correlation between OACP and CFIT is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025	0.60

The correlation between OACP and CFIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

OACP vs. CFIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OACP

OACP Risk / Return Rank: 38
OACP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
OACP Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
OACP Omega Ratio Rank: 38
OACP Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
OACP Martin Ratio Rank: 35

CFIT

CFIT Risk / Return Rank: 64
CFIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
CFIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
CFIT Omega Ratio Rank: 69
CFIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
CFIT Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OACP vs. CFIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) and Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OACP	CFIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	2.08	-0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	2.92	-0.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.40	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	2.86	-1.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.11	10.53	-5.42

OACP vs. CFIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OACP Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the CFIT Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OACP and CFIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OACP vs. CFIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OACP drawdown since its inception was -11.81%, which is greater than CFIT's maximum drawdown of -4.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OACP and CFIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	OACP	CFIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.81%	-4.23%	-7.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.60%	-4.23%	+1.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.29%	-0.28%	-1.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.57%	-1.19%	-2.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	1.15%	-0.22%

Volatility

OACP vs. CFIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) is 0.96%, while Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT) has a volatility of 2.15%. This indicates that OACP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OACP	CFIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.96%	2.15%	-1.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.67%	4.68%	-2.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.51%	5.81%	-2.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.79%	5.62%	+0.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.79%	5.62%	+0.17%

OACP vs. CFIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

OACP has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than CFIT's 0.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

OACP vs. CFIT - Dividend Comparison

OACP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, more than CFIT's 3.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CFIT Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF	3.84%	3.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OACP OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF	4.37%	4.46%	4.51%	3.87%	2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OACP and CFIT in my portfolio?

OACP and CFIT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OACP or CFIT?

CFIT has higher volatility (2.15%) compared to OACP (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OACP dropped -11.81% vs CFIT's -4.23%.

Which ETF is better, OACP or CFIT?

On 1-year performance, CFIT leads with 12.03% vs 4.76% for OACP. On fees, CFIT is cheaper at 0.71% per year. On volatility, OACP has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OACP or CFIT?

Over the 1-year period, CFIT has performed better with a 12.03% return vs 4.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OACP or CFIT?

CFIT is cheaper with a 0.71% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for OACP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OACP or CFIT?

OACP has the higher dividend yield at 4.37%, compared with 3.84% for CFIT.

What is the main difference between OACP and CFIT?

They also come from different issuers: Oneascent and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for OACP and 0.71% for CFIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CFIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.