PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OACP vs. BNDP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OACP vs. BNDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OACP achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than BNDP's 0.42% return.


OACP

1D
0.07%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.22%
6M
0.31%
1Y
5.67%
3Y*
4.43%
5Y*
10Y*

BNDP

1D
0.11%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.42%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OACP vs. BNDP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
OACP
OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF
0.22%0.16%
BNDP
Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF
0.42%0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between OACP and BNDP is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2025

0.95

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OACP vs. BNDP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OACP
OACP Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
OACP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OACP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
OACP Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
OACP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
OACP Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDP
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OACP vs. BNDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OACPBNDPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.14

OACP vs. BNDP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OACPBNDPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.29

+0.01

Drawdowns

OACP vs. BNDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OACP drawdown since its inception was -11.81%, which is greater than BNDP's maximum drawdown of -2.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OACP and BNDP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OACPBNDPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.81%

-2.60%

-9.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-1.23%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.60%

-0.86%

-2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

Volatility

OACP vs. BNDP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OACPBNDPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.55%

3.65%

-0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.81%

3.65%

+2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.81%

3.65%

+2.16%

OACP vs. BNDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

OACP has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDP's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

OACP vs. BNDP - Dividend Comparison

OACP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, more than BNDP's 2.08% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BNDP
Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF
2.08%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OACP
OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF
4.37%4.46%4.51%3.87%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, OACP and BNDP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BNDP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BNDP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for OACP.

OACP has the higher dividend yield at 4.37%, compared with 2.08% for BNDP.

They also come from different issuers: Oneascent and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for OACP and 0.05% for BNDP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OACP and BNDP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer