OACP vs. BNDP
OACP (OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF) and BNDP (Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. OACP is actively managed, while BNDP is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.95 means they have usually moved in the same direction. OACP charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for BNDP.
Performance
OACP vs. BNDP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OACP achieves a -0.70% return, which is significantly lower than BNDP's -0.46% return.
OACP
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- 6M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 1Y
- 1.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.45%
BNDP
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- 6M
- -0.62%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $504.98K | $475.70K | $762.42K | |
| $1.40M | $1.16M | $1.13M |
OACP vs. BNDP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OACP OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF | -0.70% | 0.03% |
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | -0.46% | 0.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between OACP and BNDP is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OACP vs. BNDP — Risk / Return Rank
OACP
BNDP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OACP vs. BNDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OACP | BNDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.64 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OACP vs. BNDP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OACP drawdown since its inception was -11.81%, which is greater than BNDP's maximum drawdown of -2.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OACP and BNDP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OACP | BNDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.81% | -2.60% | -9.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.22% | -2.10% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -0.98% | -2.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | — | — |
Volatility
OACP vs. BNDP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OACP | BNDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.98% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.77% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.49% | 3.65% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.74% | 3.65% | +2.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.74% | 3.65% | +2.09% |
OACP vs. BNDP - Expense Ratio Comparison
OACP has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDP's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
OACP vs. BNDP - Dividend Comparison
OACP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than BNDP's 2.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 2.47% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OACP OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF | 4.44% | 4.46% | 4.51% | 3.87% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, OACP and BNDP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BNDP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BNDP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for OACP.
OACP has the higher dividend yield at 4.44%, compared with 2.47% for BNDP.
They also come from different issuers: Oneascent and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for OACP and 0.05% for BNDP.
Find the right allocation for OACP and BNDP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer