PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OARK vs. HOOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OARK vs. HOOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) and YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OARK achieves a 3.08% return, which is significantly higher than HOOY's -13.15% return.


OARK

1D
0.49%
1M
-2.45%
YTD
3.08%
6M
0.24%
1Y
24.60%
3Y*
11.56%
5Y*
10Y*

HOOY

1D
0.37%
1M
14.96%
YTD
-13.15%
6M
-15.59%
1Y
14.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OARK vs. HOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OARK and HOOY is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2025

0.75

The correlation between OARK and HOOY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OARK vs. HOOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OARK
OARK Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
OARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
OARK Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
OARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
OARK Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

HOOY
HOOY Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
HOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OARK vs. HOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) and YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OARKHOOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.09

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

0.28

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.49

0.50

+1.99

OARK vs. HOOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OARK Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the HOOY Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OARK and HOOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OARK vs. HOOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OARK drawdown since its inception was -35.48%, smaller than the maximum HOOY drawdown of -51.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OARK and HOOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OARKHOOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.48%

-51.54%

+16.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.26%

-51.54%

+28.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.41%

-35.28%

+25.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.56%

-20.56%

+10.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.91%

28.94%

-19.03%

Volatility

OARK vs. HOOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) is 9.10%, while YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY) has a volatility of 17.45%. This indicates that OARK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OARKHOOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.10%

17.45%

-8.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.00%

42.40%

-21.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.43%

55.83%

-27.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.94%

54.40%

-23.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.94%

54.40%

-23.46%

OARK vs. HOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OARK and HOOY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

OARK vs. HOOY - Dividend Comparison

OARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 62.47%, less than HOOY's 155.65% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
HOOY
YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF
155.65%82.87%0.00%0.00%
OARK
YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF
62.47%61.86%47.86%45.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


OARK and HOOY have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOOY has higher volatility (17.45%) compared to OARK (9.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OARK dropped -35.48% vs HOOY's -51.54%.

On 1-year performance, OARK leads with 24.60% vs 14.38% for HOOY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, OARK has been the lower-risk option at 9.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OARK has performed better with a 24.60% return vs 14.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OARK and HOOY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

HOOY has the higher dividend yield at 155.65%, compared with 62.47% for OARK.

OARK is categorized as Options Trading, while HOOY is Derivative Income.

OARK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OARK and HOOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer