OARK vs. BIZD

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

OARK (YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF) and BIZD (VanEck BDC Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OARK is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax, while BIZD is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. OARK is actively managed, while BIZD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OARK returned 12.99%/yr vs 4.52%/yr for BIZD. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OARK charges 0.99%/yr vs 12.86%/yr for BIZD.

Performance

OARK vs. BIZD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OARK achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly higher than BIZD's -9.43% return.

OARK

• 1D: 1.86%
• 1M: 3.77%
• YTD: 7.87%
• 6M: 5.24%
• 1Y: 23.73%
• 3Y*: 12.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BIZD

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: -1.20%
• YTD: -9.43%
• 6M: -8.46%
• 1Y: -13.47%
• 3Y*: 4.52%
• 5Y*: 4.48%
• 10Y*: 7.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OARK vs. BIZD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
OARK YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF	7.87%	20.37%	7.32%	20.12%	-9.11%
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF	-9.43%	-4.96%	15.63%	27.02%	-5.51%

Correlation

The correlation between OARK and BIZD is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2022	0.47

Return for Risk

OARK vs. BIZD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OARK

OARK Risk / Return Rank: 23
OARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
OARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
OARK Omega Ratio Rank: 23
OARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
OARK Martin Ratio Rank: 20

BIZD

BIZD Risk / Return Rank: 4
BIZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BIZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BIZD Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BIZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BIZD Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OARK vs. BIZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OARK	BIZD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	-0.73	+1.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	-0.95	+2.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	0.89	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.02	-0.61	+1.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.39	-1.02	+3.42

OARK vs. BIZD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OARK Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the BIZD Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OARK and BIZD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OARK vs. BIZD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OARK drawdown since its inception was -35.48%, smaller than the maximum BIZD drawdown of -55.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OARK and BIZD.

Drawdown Indicators

	OARK	BIZD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.48%	-55.44%	+19.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.26%	-22.22%	-1.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.48%	-22.56%	-12.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.91%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-55.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.20%	-19.66%	+14.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.54%	-6.75%	-3.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.94%	13.18%	-3.24%

Volatility

OARK vs. BIZD - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) has a higher volatility of 9.51% compared to VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) at 5.51%. This indicates that OARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OARK	BIZD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.51%	5.51%	+4.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.26%	15.14%	+6.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.57%	18.48%	+10.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.95%	17.44%	+13.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.95%	21.77%	+9.18%

OARK vs. BIZD - Expense Ratio Comparison

OARK has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than BIZD's 12.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

OARK vs. BIZD - Dividend Comparison

OARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 60.86%, more than BIZD's 13.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF	13.94%	11.78%	10.94%	10.96%	11.21%	8.14%	10.39%	9.13%	10.88%	9.13%	8.51%	9.12%
OARK YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF	60.86%	61.86%	47.86%	45.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OARK and BIZD in my portfolio?

OARK and BIZD have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OARK or BIZD?

OARK has higher volatility (9.51%) compared to BIZD (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OARK dropped -35.48% vs BIZD's -55.44%.

Which ETF is better, OARK or BIZD?

On 3-year performance, OARK leads with 12.99% vs 4.52% for BIZD. On fees, OARK is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, BIZD has been the lower-risk option at 5.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OARK or BIZD?

Over the 3-year period, OARK has performed better with a 12.99% return vs 4.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OARK or BIZD?

OARK is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 12.86% for BIZD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OARK or BIZD?

OARK has the higher dividend yield at 60.86%, compared with 13.94% for BIZD.

What is the main difference between OARK and BIZD?

OARK is categorized as Options Trading, while BIZD is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for OARK and 12.86% for BIZD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OARK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.