OARK vs. AMDY
OARK (YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF) and AMDY (YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Options Trading funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OARK returned 32.85% vs 240.44% for AMDY. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
OARK vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OARK achieves a 6.11% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 110.49% return.
OARK
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 6.11%
- 6M
- 4.26%
- 1Y
- 32.85%
- 3Y*
- 14.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDY
- 1D
- 3.39%
- 1M
- 46.76%
- YTD
- 110.49%
- 6M
- 111.80%
- 1Y
- 240.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OARK vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OARK YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF | 6.11% | 20.37% | 7.32% | 11.46% |
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF | 110.49% | 53.93% | -17.00% | 26.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between OARK and AMDY is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OARK vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank
OARK
AMDY
OARK vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OARK | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.64 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 8.77 | -7.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.37 | 19.77 | -16.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OARK | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 4.53 | -3.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 1.25 | -0.85 |
Drawdowns
OARK vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OARK drawdown since its inception was -35.48%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OARK and AMDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OARK | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.48% | -53.92% | +18.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.26% | -27.59% | +4.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.75% | 0.00% | -6.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.58% | -18.02% | +7.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.77% | 12.22% | -2.45% |
Volatility
OARK vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) is 6.50%, while YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) has a volatility of 20.81%. This indicates that OARK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OARK | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 20.81% | -14.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.93% | 39.99% | -20.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.07% | 53.40% | -25.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.84% | 46.01% | -15.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.84% | 46.01% | -15.17% |
OARK vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both OARK and AMDY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
OARK vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison
OARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 64.29%, more than AMDY's 54.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF | 54.91% | 80.68% | 109.98% | 6.68% |
OARK YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF | 64.29% | 61.86% | 47.86% | 45.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OARK and AMDY have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMDY has higher volatility (20.81%) compared to OARK (6.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OARK dropped -35.48% vs AMDY's -53.92%.
On 1-year performance, AMDY leads with 240.44% vs 32.85% for OARK. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, OARK has been the lower-risk option at 6.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AMDY has performed better with a 240.44% return vs 32.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OARK and AMDY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
OARK has the higher dividend yield at 64.29%, compared with 54.91% for AMDY.
AMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.53 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OARK and AMDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer