PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
OALC vs. EINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

OALC vs. EINC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

OALC (OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OALC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Oneascent, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. OALC is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OALC returned 22.15%/yr vs 30.36%/yr for EINC. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OALC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.

Performance

OALC vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OALC achieves a 13.18% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 25.97% return.

OALC

1D
-1.66%
1M
0.31%
YTD
13.18%
6M
12.19%
1Y
28.83%
3Y*
22.15%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

EINC

1D
1.37%
1M
-4.50%
YTD
25.97%
6M
25.98%
1Y
29.82%
3Y*
30.36%
5Y*
21.18%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OALC vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
OALC
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF		13.18%20.36%19.64%22.03%-18.08%-0.32%
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		25.97%7.11%42.79%15.55%19.18%-5.52%

Correlation

The correlation between OALC and EINC is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021

0.39

The correlation between OALC and EINC shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

OALC vs. EINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
OALC
EINC

Technology

37.8%

-

Financial Services

14.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%

-

Communication Services

8.4%

-

Industrials

7.6%
2.5%

Healthcare

6.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.3%

-

Utilities

3.0%
0.6%

Energy

2.5%
99.4%

Basic Materials

1.3%

-

Real Estate

1.0%

-

Technology

OALC
37.8%
EINC

-

Financial Services

OALC
14.7%
EINC

-

Consumer Cyclical

OALC
11.1%
EINC

-

Communication Services

OALC
8.4%
EINC

-

Industrials

OALC
7.6%
EINC
2.5%

Healthcare

OALC
6.4%
EINC

-

Consumer Defensive

OALC
5.3%
EINC

-

Utilities

OALC
3.0%
EINC
0.6%

Energy

OALC
2.5%
EINC
99.4%

Basic Materials

OALC
1.3%
EINC

-

Real Estate

OALC
1.0%
EINC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF

VanEck Energy Income ETF

Often compared with OALC:
OALC vs. FTGSOALC vs. BDGSOALC vs. PSCXOALC vs. OACPOALC vs. OAEMOALC vs. OAIMOALC vs. BLCR
Often compared with EINC:
EINC vs. XLEEINC vs. BIZDEINC vs. EMLPEINC vs. SMHEINC vs. IXCEINC vs. VPUEINC vs. ERY

Return for Risk

OALC vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
OALC
OALC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
OALC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OALC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
OALC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
OALC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
OALC Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
EINC
EINC Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OALC vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

OALCEINCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.09
1.99

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.84
2.67

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.35

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

3.80

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.19

9.63

+5.56

OALC vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OALC Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the EINC Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OALC and EINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OALC vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OALC drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OALC and EINC.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

OALCEINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.82%

-87.55%

+60.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.42%

-7.89%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.64%

-16.01%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-19.87%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-68.85%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.70%

-4.50%

+1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.98%

-44.15%

+37.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

3.10%

-1.20%

Volatility

OALC vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) is 5.67%, while VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that OALC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

OALCEINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.67%

6.51%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

11.88%

-0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.86%

15.10%

-1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.35%

19.54%

-2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.35%

25.43%

-8.08%

OALC vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

OALC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

OALC vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

OALC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than EINC's 3.51% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		3.51%4.51%3.33%3.77%2.89%6.03%6.69%9.66%11.31%8.53%9.71%28.53%
OALC
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF		0.54%0.61%0.70%0.40%0.40%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

OALC and EINC have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EINC has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to OALC (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OALC dropped -26.82% vs EINC's -87.55%.

On 3-year performance, EINC leads with 30.36% vs 22.15% for OALC. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, OALC has been the lower-risk option at 5.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, EINC has performed better with a 30.36% return vs 22.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for OALC.

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 0.54% for OALC.

OALC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EINC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Oneascent and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for OALC and 0.45% for EINC.

OALC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OALC and EINC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer