OAKMX vs. RSP
OAKMX (Oakmark Fund Investor Class) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both funds - OAKMX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Oakmark, while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Over the past 10 years, OAKMX returned 13.52%/yr vs 12.15%/yr for RSP. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OAKMX charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.
Performance
OAKMX vs. RSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OAKMX achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 10.96% return. Over the past 10 years, OAKMX has outperformed RSP with an annualized return of 13.52%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively lower 12.15% annualized return.
OAKMX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 1.33%
- YTD
- -1.16%
- 6M
- -1.64%
- 1Y
- 10.14%
- 3Y*
- 14.13%
- 5Y*
- 9.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.52%
RSP
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 3.92%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 21.34%
- 3Y*
- 14.66%
- 5Y*
- 8.59%
- 10Y*
- 12.15%
OAKMX vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OAKMX Oakmark Fund Investor Class | -1.16% | 14.13% | 16.02% | 30.92% | -13.38% | 34.85% | 12.90% | 27.14% | -12.76% | 21.12% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 10.96% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -11.62% | 29.41% | 12.66% | 28.91% | -7.84% | 18.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between OAKMX and RSP is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2003 | 0.93 |
The correlation between OAKMX and RSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OAKMX vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank
OAKMX
RSP
OAKMX vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Fund Investor Class (OAKMX) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OAKMX | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.29 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 2.54 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.18 | 9.63 | -6.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OAKMX vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OAKMX drawdown since its inception was -56.19%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAKMX and RSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OAKMX | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.19% | -59.92% | +3.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.98% | -7.85% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.05% | -17.81% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.68% | -21.38% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.43% | -39.04% | -2.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.69% | 0.00% | -3.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.39% | -6.64% | +0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 2.07% | +0.72% |
Volatility
OAKMX vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison
Oakmark Fund Investor Class (OAKMX) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) have volatilities of 3.66% and 3.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OAKMX | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 3.57% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.57% | 8.59% | +0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.13% | 11.83% | +1.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 16.22% | +2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 18.36% | +2.04% |
OAKMX vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
OAKMX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
OAKMX vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison
OAKMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than RSP's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OAKMX Oakmark Fund Investor Class | 0.93% | 0.92% | 1.12% | 1.02% | 0.92% | 1.94% | 0.17% | 8.33% | 8.13% | 4.06% | 2.58% | 1.43% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.47% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OAKMX and RSP have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OAKMX has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to RSP (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OAKMX dropped -56.19% vs RSP's -59.92%.
RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OAKMX and RSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer