OAKM vs. ROE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

OAKM (Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF) and ROE (Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OAKM returned 13.56% vs 37.99% for ROE. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OAKM charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ROE.

Performance

OAKM vs. ROE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OAKM achieves a -2.01% return, which is significantly lower than ROE's 20.98% return.

OAKM

• 1D: -1.38%
• 1M: -1.24%
• YTD: -2.01%
• 6M: 1.19%
• 1Y: 13.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ROE

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 8.10%
• YTD: 20.98%
• 6M: 21.56%
• 1Y: 37.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OAKM vs. ROE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
OAKM Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF	-2.01%	21.46%	-4.83%
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF	20.98%	17.20%	-5.46%

Correlation

The correlation between OAKM and ROE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024	0.70

The correlation between OAKM and ROE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

OAKM vs. ROE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OAKM

OAKM Risk / Return Rank: 32
OAKM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
OAKM Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
OAKM Omega Ratio Rank: 28
OAKM Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
OAKM Martin Ratio Rank: 33

ROE

ROE Risk / Return Rank: 83
ROE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
ROE Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
ROE Omega Ratio Rank: 80
ROE Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
ROE Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OAKM vs. ROE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OAKM	ROE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	2.74	-1.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	3.69	-2.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.48	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	4.41	-2.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.92	19.92	-15.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OAKM vs. ROE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OAKM Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the ROE Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OAKM and ROE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OAKM	ROE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.05	2.74	-1.69
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	1.39	-0.86

Drawdowns

OAKM vs. ROE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OAKM drawdown since its inception was -15.24%, smaller than the maximum ROE drawdown of -19.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAKM and ROE.

Drawdown Indicators

	OAKM	ROE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.24%	-19.10%	+3.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.19%	-8.66%	+1.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.44%	-0.04%	-4.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.77%	-2.59%	-0.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.76%	1.91%	+0.85%

Volatility

OAKM vs. ROE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM) is 3.09%, while Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) has a volatility of 3.79%. This indicates that OAKM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OAKM	ROE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.09%	3.79%	-0.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.37%	10.66%	-1.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.98%	13.94%	-0.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.51%	15.78%	+0.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.51%	15.78%	+0.73%

OAKM vs. ROE - Expense Ratio Comparison

OAKM has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ROE's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

OAKM vs. ROE - Dividend Comparison

OAKM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than ROE's 0.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
OAKM Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF	0.68%	0.67%	0.04%	0.00%
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF	0.94%	0.97%	1.18%	0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OAKM and ROE in my portfolio?

OAKM and ROE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OAKM or ROE?

ROE has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to OAKM (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OAKM dropped -15.24% vs ROE's -19.10%.

Which ETF is better, OAKM or ROE?

On 1-year performance, ROE leads with 37.99% vs 13.56% for OAKM. On fees, ROE is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, OAKM has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OAKM or ROE?

Over the 1-year period, ROE has performed better with a 37.99% return vs 13.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OAKM or ROE?

ROE is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for OAKM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OAKM or ROE?

ROE has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.68% for OAKM.

What is the main difference between OAKM and ROE?

They also come from different issuers: Oakmark and Astoria. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for OAKM and 0.49% for ROE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.