OAKG vs. VT

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

OAKG (Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both Global Equities funds. OAKG is actively managed, while VT is passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OAKG charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.

Performance

OAKG vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF (OAKG) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OAKG achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 11.34% return.

OAKG

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 1.70%
• 6M: -3.43%
• YTD: 0.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VT

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: -0.82%
• 6M: 8.37%
• YTD: 11.34%
• 1Y: 22.85%
• 3Y*: 18.61%
• 5Y*: 10.87%
• 10Y*: 12.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OAKG vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
OAKG Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF	0.13%	1.02%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	11.34%	0.01%

Correlation

The correlation between OAKG and VT is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025	0.73

Return for Risk

OAKG vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OAKG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 63
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 62
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OAKG vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF (OAKG) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OAKG	VT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.68	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.34	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.30	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.37	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.09	—

Drawdowns

OAKG vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OAKG drawdown since its inception was -11.52%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAKG and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	OAKG	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.52%	-50.27%	+38.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.67%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.51%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.38%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.57%	-1.67%	-1.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.36%	-6.98%	+2.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.27%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	OAKG	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.93%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.49%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.79%	13.67%	+1.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.79%	16.20%	-1.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.79%	17.16%	-2.37%

OAKG vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

OAKG has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

OAKG vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

OAKG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than VT's 1.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
OAKG Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF	0.04%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.59%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OAKG and VT in my portfolio?

OAKG and VT have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, OAKG or VT?

On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, OAKG or VT?

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for OAKG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OAKG or VT?

VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.04% for OAKG.

What is the main difference between OAKG and VT?

They also come from different issuers: Oakmark and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for OAKG and 0.06% for VT.