PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OAKCX vs. OAYMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OAKCX vs. OAYMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oakmark Bond Fund Investor Class (OAKCX) and Oakmark Fund Advisor Class (OAYMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OAKCX achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly higher than OAYMX's -1.10% return.


OAKCX

1D
0.45%
1M
0.80%
YTD
1.13%
6M
1.07%
1Y
4.89%
3Y*
5.02%
5Y*
10Y*

OAYMX

1D
0.63%
1M
0.10%
YTD
-1.10%
6M
-2.06%
1Y
9.15%
3Y*
14.87%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OAKCX vs. OAYMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
OAKCX
Oakmark Bond Fund Investor Class
1.13%6.85%2.90%5.91%-9.75%
OAYMX
Oakmark Fund Advisor Class
-1.10%14.35%16.24%31.18%-10.20%

Correlation

The correlation between OAKCX and OAYMX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OAKCX vs. OAYMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OAKCX
OAKCX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
OAKCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OAKCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
OAKCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
OAKCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
OAKCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

OAYMX
OAYMX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
OAYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OAYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
OAYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
OAYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
OAYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OAKCX vs. OAYMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Bond Fund Investor Class (OAKCX) and Oakmark Fund Advisor Class (OAYMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OAKCXOAYMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.12

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

1.26

+0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.67

3.09

+2.58

OAKCX vs. OAYMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OAKCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the OAYMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OAKCX and OAYMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OAKCX vs. OAYMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OAKCX drawdown since its inception was -13.38%, smaller than the maximum OAYMX drawdown of -40.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAKCX and OAYMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OAKCXOAYMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.38%

-40.09%

+26.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.63%

-6.94%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.56%

-17.02%

+11.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-3.64%

+2.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.76%

-5.53%

+0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

2.84%

-1.95%

Volatility

OAKCX vs. OAYMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Oakmark Bond Fund Investor Class (OAKCX) is 1.18%, while Oakmark Fund Advisor Class (OAYMX) has a volatility of 3.80%. This indicates that OAKCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OAYMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OAKCXOAYMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.18%

3.80%

-2.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

9.47%

-6.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.50%

13.19%

-9.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.35%

18.26%

-12.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.35%

20.48%

-15.13%

OAKCX vs. OAYMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OAKCX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than OAYMX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

OAKCX vs. OAYMX - Dividend Comparison

OAKCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than OAYMX's 1.14% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
OAKCX
Oakmark Bond Fund Investor Class
4.57%3.57%4.37%3.62%2.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OAYMX
Oakmark Fund Advisor Class
1.14%1.12%1.30%1.19%1.16%1.64%0.27%8.44%8.35%4.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


OAKCX and OAYMX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OAYMX has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to OAKCX (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OAKCX dropped -13.38% vs OAYMX's -40.09%.

OAKCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OAKCX and OAYMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer