PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OAKCX vs. LFLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OAKCX vs. LFLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oakmark Bond Fund Investor Class (OAKCX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - Flexible Bond Fund (LFLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OAKCX achieves a -0.15% return, which is significantly lower than LFLIX's 3.07% return.


OAKCX

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.95%
6M
-0.39%
YTD
-0.15%
1Y
2.37%
3Y*
4.43%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.07%

LFLIX

1D
0.32%
1M
-0.11%
6M
1.67%
YTD
3.07%
1Y
6.97%
3Y*
6.16%
5Y*
2.21%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

OAKCX vs. LFLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
OAKCX
Oakmark Bond Fund Investor Class
-0.15%6.85%2.90%5.91%-9.75%
LFLIX
BrandywineGLOBAL - Flexible Bond Fund
3.07%8.82%2.95%9.57%-9.80%

Correlation

The correlation between OAKCX and LFLIX is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022

0.81

The correlation between OAKCX and LFLIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OAKCX vs. LFLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OAKCX
OAKCX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
OAKCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OAKCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
OAKCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
OAKCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
OAKCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

LFLIX
LFLIX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
LFLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
LFLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OAKCX vs. LFLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Bond Fund Investor Class (OAKCX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - Flexible Bond Fund (LFLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OAKCXLFLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.36

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

2.70

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.08

9.44

-6.35

OAKCX vs. LFLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OAKCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the LFLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OAKCX and LFLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OAKCX vs. LFLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OAKCX drawdown since its inception was -13.38%, smaller than the maximum LFLIX drawdown of -16.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAKCX and LFLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OAKCXLFLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.38%

-16.73%

+3.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.63%

-2.72%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.71%

-6.20%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-0.48%

-1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-2.82%

-1.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

0.78%

+0.22%

Volatility

OAKCX vs. LFLIX - Volatility Comparison

Oakmark Bond Fund Investor Class (OAKCX) has a higher volatility of 1.04% compared to BrandywineGLOBAL - Flexible Bond Fund (LFLIX) at 0.91%. This indicates that OAKCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LFLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OAKCXLFLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.04%

0.91%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.79%

3.47%

-0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.47%

4.04%

-0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.32%

5.75%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.32%

5.07%

+0.25%

OAKCX vs. LFLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OAKCX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than LFLIX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

OAKCX vs. LFLIX - Dividend Comparison

OAKCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, less than LFLIX's 6.64% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LFLIX
BrandywineGLOBAL - Flexible Bond Fund
6.64%6.67%8.94%5.36%3.28%2.90%3.62%6.04%3.67%3.06%
OAKCX
Oakmark Bond Fund Investor Class
4.59%3.57%4.37%3.62%2.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OAKCX and LFLIX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OAKCX has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to LFLIX (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OAKCX dropped -13.38% vs LFLIX's -16.73%.

LFLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OAKCX and LFLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer