OAEM vs. STXE

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

OAEM (OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF) and STXE (Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. OAEM is actively managed, while STXE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OAEM returned 17.64%/yr vs 24.14%/yr for STXE. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OAEM charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for STXE.

Performance

OAEM vs. STXE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OAEM achieves a 27.35% return, which is significantly lower than STXE's 34.42% return.

OAEM

• 1D: -4.21%
• 1M: -4.31%
• 6M: 20.45%
• YTD: 27.35%
• 1Y: 44.56%
• 3Y*: 17.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

STXE

• 1D: -4.66%
• 1M: -5.87%
• 6M: 26.56%
• YTD: 34.42%
• 1Y: 58.13%
• 3Y*: 24.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OAEM vs. STXE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
OAEM OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF	27.35%	26.67%	0.43%	6.40%
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF	34.42%	34.23%	2.09%	12.38%

Correlation

The correlation between OAEM and STXE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2023	0.85

The correlation between OAEM and STXE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

OAEM vs. STXE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OAEM

OAEM Risk / Return Rank: 68
OAEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
OAEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
OAEM Omega Ratio Rank: 66
OAEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
OAEM Martin Ratio Rank: 77

STXE

STXE Risk / Return Rank: 82
STXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
STXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
STXE Omega Ratio Rank: 83
STXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
STXE Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OAEM vs. STXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OAEM	STXE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	2.08	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	2.60	-0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.39	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	4.03	-0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.34	14.03	-2.69

OAEM vs. STXE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OAEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the STXE Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OAEM and STXE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OAEM vs. STXE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OAEM drawdown since its inception was -17.05%, smaller than the maximum STXE drawdown of -18.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAEM and STXE.

Drawdown Indicators

	OAEM	STXE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.05%	-18.92%	+1.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.63%	-14.51%	-0.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.05%	-18.92%	+1.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.79%	-12.68%	+2.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.88%	-3.78%	-0.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.94%	4.16%	-0.22%

Volatility

OAEM vs. STXE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) is 12.68%, while Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) has a volatility of 14.44%. This indicates that OAEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STXE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OAEM	STXE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.68%	14.44%	-1.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.52%	26.40%	-1.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.43%	28.09%	-1.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.70%	19.56%	+1.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.70%	19.56%	+1.14%

OAEM vs. STXE - Expense Ratio Comparison

OAEM has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than STXE's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

OAEM vs. STXE - Dividend Comparison

OAEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than STXE's 1.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
OAEM OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF	0.61%	0.77%	0.91%	1.63%	0.04%
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF	1.87%	2.66%	3.22%	1.08%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OAEM and STXE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, OAEM and STXE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, OAEM or STXE?

STXE has higher volatility (14.44%) compared to OAEM (12.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OAEM dropped -17.05% vs STXE's -18.92%.

Which ETF is better, OAEM or STXE?

On 3-year performance, STXE leads with 24.14% vs 17.64% for OAEM. On fees, STXE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, OAEM has been the lower-risk option at 12.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OAEM or STXE?

Over the 3-year period, STXE has performed better with a 24.14% return vs 17.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OAEM or STXE?

STXE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for OAEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OAEM or STXE?

STXE has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 0.61% for OAEM.

What is the main difference between OAEM and STXE?

They also come from different issuers: Oneascent and Strive. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for OAEM and 0.32% for STXE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STXE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.