OAEM vs. STXE
OAEM (OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF) and STXE (Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. OAEM is actively managed, while STXE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OAEM returned 21.19%/yr vs 29.77%/yr for STXE. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OAEM charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for STXE.
Performance
OAEM vs. STXE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OAEM achieves a 36.06% return, which is significantly lower than STXE's 47.29% return.
OAEM
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 7.11%
- YTD
- 36.06%
- 6M
- 43.08%
- 1Y
- 62.43%
- 3Y*
- 21.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STXE
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 15.10%
- YTD
- 47.29%
- 6M
- 52.92%
- 1Y
- 84.40%
- 3Y*
- 29.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OAEM vs. STXE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OAEM OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF | 36.06% | 26.67% | 0.43% | 6.57% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 47.29% | 34.23% | 2.09% | 11.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between OAEM and STXE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2023 | 0.84 |
The correlation between OAEM and STXE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
OAEM vs. STXE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OAEM
STXE
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
OAEM
STXE
Industrials
OAEM
STXE
Financial Services
OAEM
STXE
Basic Materials
OAEM
STXE
Consumer Cyclical
OAEM
STXE
Utilities
OAEM
STXE
Consumer Defensive
OAEM
STXE
Communication Services
OAEM
STXE
Energy
OAEM
STXE
Healthcare
OAEM
-
STXE
Real Estate
OAEM
-
STXE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OAEM vs. STXE — Risk / Return Rank
OAEM
STXE
OAEM vs. STXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OAEM | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.81 | 3.70 | -0.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.53 | 4.47 | -0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.65 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.29 | 5.85 | -1.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.91 | 23.95 | -6.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OAEM | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 3.70 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 1.57 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
OAEM vs. STXE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OAEM drawdown since its inception was -17.05%, smaller than the maximum STXE drawdown of -18.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAEM and STXE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OAEM | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.05% | -18.92% | +1.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.63% | -14.51% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.05% | -18.92% | +1.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | -1.00% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.86% | -3.72% | -0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | 3.54% | -0.04% |
Volatility
OAEM vs. STXE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) is 8.12%, while Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that OAEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STXE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OAEM | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.12% | 10.53% | -2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.82% | 20.81% | -0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.32% | 22.95% | -0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.55% | 17.68% | +1.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.55% | 17.68% | +1.87% |
OAEM vs. STXE - Expense Ratio Comparison
OAEM has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than STXE's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
OAEM vs. STXE - Dividend Comparison
OAEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than STXE's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OAEM OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF | 0.57% | 0.77% | 0.91% | 1.63% | 0.04% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 1.83% | 2.66% | 3.22% | 1.08% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OAEM and STXE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STXE has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to OAEM (8.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OAEM dropped -17.05% vs STXE's -18.92%.
On 3-year performance, STXE leads with 29.77% vs 21.19% for OAEM. On fees, STXE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, OAEM has been the lower-risk option at 8.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, STXE has performed better with a 29.77% return vs 21.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STXE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for OAEM.
STXE has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.57% for OAEM.
They also come from different issuers: Oneascent and Strive. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for OAEM and 0.32% for STXE.
STXE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 2.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OAEM and STXE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer