OAEM vs. HEEM
OAEM (OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF) and HEEM (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. OAEM is actively managed, while HEEM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OAEM returned 21.19%/yr vs 27.05%/yr for HEEM. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OAEM charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for HEEM.
Performance
OAEM vs. HEEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OAEM achieves a 36.06% return, which is significantly higher than HEEM's 30.24% return.
OAEM
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 7.11%
- YTD
- 36.06%
- 6M
- 43.08%
- 1Y
- 62.43%
- 3Y*
- 21.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HEEM
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 10.04%
- YTD
- 30.24%
- 6M
- 32.57%
- 1Y
- 63.91%
- 3Y*
- 27.05%
- 5Y*
- 10.42%
- 10Y*
- 11.42%
OAEM vs. HEEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OAEM OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF | 36.06% | 26.67% | 0.43% | 17.97% | 1.97% |
HEEM iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 30.24% | 34.02% | 12.59% | 10.14% | -1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between OAEM and HEEM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022 | 0.78 |
The correlation between OAEM and HEEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
OAEM vs. HEEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OAEM
HEEM
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
OAEM
HEEM
Industrials
OAEM
HEEM
Financial Services
OAEM
HEEM
Basic Materials
OAEM
HEEM
Consumer Cyclical
OAEM
HEEM
Utilities
OAEM
HEEM
Consumer Defensive
OAEM
HEEM
Communication Services
OAEM
HEEM
Energy
OAEM
HEEM
Healthcare
OAEM
-
HEEM
Real Estate
OAEM
-
HEEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OAEM vs. HEEM — Risk / Return Rank
OAEM
HEEM
OAEM vs. HEEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OAEM | HEEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.81 | 3.64 | -0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.53 | 4.70 | -1.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.68 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.29 | 5.93 | -1.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.91 | 23.76 | -5.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OAEM | HEEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 3.64 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.49 | +0.63 |
Drawdowns
OAEM vs. HEEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OAEM drawdown since its inception was -17.05%, smaller than the maximum HEEM drawdown of -33.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAEM and HEEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OAEM | HEEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.05% | -33.53% | +16.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.63% | -10.83% | -3.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.05% | -14.82% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | -0.64% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.86% | -11.14% | +7.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | 2.70% | +0.80% |
Volatility
OAEM vs. HEEM - Volatility Comparison
OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) has a higher volatility of 8.12% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) at 7.57%. This indicates that OAEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OAEM | HEEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.12% | 7.57% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.82% | 15.37% | +4.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.32% | 17.67% | +4.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.55% | 17.01% | +2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.55% | 17.97% | +1.58% |
OAEM vs. HEEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
OAEM has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than HEEM's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
OAEM vs. HEEM - Dividend Comparison
OAEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than HEEM's 3.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEEM iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 3.05% | 3.98% | 2.38% | 2.75% | 7.49% | 1.93% | 1.49% | 3.04% | 2.37% | 2.05% | 1.84% | 6.28% |
OAEM OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF | 0.57% | 0.77% | 0.91% | 1.63% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OAEM and HEEM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OAEM has higher volatility (8.12%) compared to HEEM (7.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OAEM dropped -17.05% vs HEEM's -33.53%.
On 3-year performance, HEEM leads with 27.05% vs 21.19% for OAEM. On fees, HEEM is cheaper at 0.72% per year. On volatility, HEEM has been the lower-risk option at 7.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HEEM has performed better with a 27.05% return vs 21.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HEEM is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for OAEM.
HEEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.57% for OAEM.
They also come from different issuers: Oneascent and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for OAEM and 0.72% for HEEM.
HEEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.64 vs 2.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OAEM and HEEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer