OAEM vs. DEM
OAEM (OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF) and DEM (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - OAEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Oneascent, while DEM is a Dividend fund tracking the WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Index. OAEM is actively managed, while DEM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OAEM returned 18.13%/yr vs 15.88%/yr for DEM. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. OAEM charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for DEM.
Performance
OAEM vs. DEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OAEM achieves a 26.54% return, which is significantly higher than DEM's 17.08% return.
OAEM
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -2.87%
- 6M
- 13.83%
- YTD
- 26.54%
- 1Y
- 43.91%
- 3Y*
- 18.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.43%
DEM
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 10.28%
- YTD
- 17.08%
- 1Y
- 24.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.90M | $9.48M | $10.87M | |
| $452.20K | $547.88K | $1.41M |
OAEM vs. DEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OAEM OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF | 26.54% | 26.67% | 0.43% | 17.97% | 1.40% |
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 17.08% | 21.29% | 4.46% | 20.93% | 2.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between OAEM and DEM is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2022 | 0.78 |
The correlation between OAEM and DEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
OAEM vs. DEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OAEM
DEM
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Healthcare
-
Technology
OAEM
DEM
Industrials
OAEM
DEM
Financial Services
OAEM
DEM
Basic Materials
OAEM
DEM
Consumer Cyclical
OAEM
DEM
Real Estate
OAEM
DEM
Energy
OAEM
DEM
Consumer Defensive
OAEM
DEM
Communication Services
OAEM
DEM
Utilities
OAEM
DEM
Healthcare
OAEM
-
DEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OAEM vs. DEM — Risk / Return Rank
OAEM
DEM
OAEM vs. DEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OAEM | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.30 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 3.15 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.24 | 9.50 | -0.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OAEM vs. DEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OAEM drawdown since its inception was -17.05%, smaller than the maximum DEM drawdown of -51.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAEM and DEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OAEM | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.05% | -51.85% | +34.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.09% | -7.89% | -7.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.05% | -15.64% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.37% | -3.57% | -6.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.98% | -12.82% | +8.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.64% | 2.61% | +2.03% |
Volatility
OAEM vs. DEM - Volatility Comparison
OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) has a higher volatility of 10.55% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) at 5.12%. This indicates that OAEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OAEM | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.55% | 5.12% | +5.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.40% | 13.28% | +12.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.41% | 15.02% | +12.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.93% | 15.60% | +5.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.93% | 17.85% | +3.08% |
OAEM vs. DEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
OAEM has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than DEM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
OAEM vs. DEM - Dividend Comparison
OAEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than DEM's 4.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 4.18% | 4.88% | 5.24% | 5.49% | 8.62% | 5.87% | 4.21% | 4.78% | 4.47% | 3.67% | 3.63% | 5.21% |
OAEM OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF | 0.61% | 0.77% | 0.91% | 1.63% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OAEM and DEM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OAEM has higher volatility (10.55%) compared to DEM (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OAEM dropped -17.05% vs DEM's -51.85%.
On 3-year performance, OAEM leads with 18.13% vs 15.88% for DEM. On fees, DEM is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, DEM has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, OAEM has performed better with a 18.13% return vs 15.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DEM is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for OAEM.
DEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.18%, compared with 0.61% for OAEM.
OAEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DEM is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Oneascent and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for OAEM and 0.63% for DEM.
DEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OAEM and DEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer