OAEM vs. AVXC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) and Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC).

OAEM and AVXC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. OAEM is an actively managed fund by Oneascent. It was launched on Sep 14, 2022. AVXC is a passively managed fund by Avantis Investors that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets IMI. It was launched on Mar 19, 2024.

Performance

OAEM vs. AVXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) and Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

OAEM vs. AVXC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
OAEM OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF	10.06%	26.67%	-1.65%
AVXC Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF	6.08%	31.45%	-0.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OAEM achieves a 10.06% return, which is significantly higher than AVXC's 6.08% return.

OAEM

• 1D: 4.31%
• 1M: -10.94%
• YTD: 10.06%
• 6M: 18.04%
• 1Y: 41.48%
• 3Y*: 13.52%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AVXC

• 1D: 3.79%
• 1M: -10.21%
• YTD: 6.08%
• 6M: 14.48%
• 1Y: 42.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OAEM vs. AVXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

OAEM has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than AVXC's 0.33% expense ratio.

OAEM

OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF

AVXC

Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF

Return for Risk

OAEM vs. AVXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OAEM

OAEM Risk / Return Rank: 88
OAEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
OAEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
OAEM Omega Ratio Rank: 86
OAEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
OAEM Martin Ratio Rank: 90

AVXC

AVXC Risk / Return Rank: 92
AVXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
AVXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
AVXC Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AVXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
AVXC Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OAEM vs. AVXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) and Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OAEM	AVXC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	2.18	-0.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	2.82	-0.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.41	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	2.94	-0.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.06	12.26	-0.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OAEM vs. AVXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OAEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the AVXC Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OAEM and AVXC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OAEM	AVXC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.86	2.18	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	1.01	-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between OAEM and AVXC is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

OAEM vs. AVXC - Dividend Comparison

OAEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than AVXC's 1.89% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
OAEM OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF	0.70%	0.77%	0.91%	1.63%	0.04%
AVXC Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF	1.89%	1.97%	1.34%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

OAEM vs. AVXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OAEM drawdown since its inception was -17.05%, smaller than the maximum AVXC drawdown of -20.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAEM and AVXC.

Drawdown Indicators

	OAEM	AVXC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.05%	-20.44%	+3.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.63%	-14.04%	-0.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.94%	-10.78%	-0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.94%	-3.92%	-0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.38%	3.36%	+0.02%

Volatility

OAEM vs. AVXC - Volatility Comparison

OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) has a higher volatility of 13.45% compared to Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) at 10.67%. This indicates that OAEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OAEM	AVXC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.45%	10.67%	+2.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.65%	14.72%	+2.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.39%	19.40%	+2.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.00%	17.27%	+1.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.00%	17.27%	+1.73%