OACP vs. SMTH

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

OACP (OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF) and SMTH (ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OACP returned 4.60% vs 4.39% for SMTH. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OACP charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SMTH.

Performance

OACP vs. SMTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) and ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OACP achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly lower than SMTH's 0.31% return.

OACP

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -0.18%
• 6M: -0.24%
• YTD: 0.17%
• 1Y: 4.60%
• 3Y*: 4.40%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SMTH

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -0.30%
• 6M: -0.08%
• YTD: 0.31%
• 1Y: 4.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OACP vs. SMTH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
OACP OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF	0.17%	7.17%	2.37%	2.61%
SMTH ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF	0.31%	6.86%	2.76%	3.80%

Correlation

The correlation between OACP and SMTH is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023	0.90

The correlation between OACP and SMTH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

OACP vs. SMTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OACP

OACP Risk / Return Rank: 43
OACP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
OACP Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
OACP Omega Ratio Rank: 44
OACP Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
OACP Martin Ratio Rank: 37

SMTH

SMTH Risk / Return Rank: 38
SMTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
SMTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
SMTH Omega Ratio Rank: 36
SMTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
SMTH Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OACP vs. SMTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) and ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OACP	SMTH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	1.19	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.95	1.77	+0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.21	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	1.61	+0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.76	4.48	+0.28

OACP vs. SMTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OACP Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the SMTH Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OACP and SMTH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OACP vs. SMTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OACP drawdown since its inception was -11.81%, which is greater than SMTH's maximum drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OACP and SMTH.

Drawdown Indicators

	OACP	SMTH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.81%	-4.11%	-7.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.60%	-2.74%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.36%	-1.44%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.53%	-1.06%	-2.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.97%	0.98%	-0.01%

Volatility

OACP vs. SMTH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) is 0.93%, while ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) has a volatility of 1.03%. This indicates that OACP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OACP	SMTH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.93%	1.03%	-0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.73%	2.82%	-0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.47%	3.71%	-0.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.76%	4.55%	+1.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.76%	4.55%	+1.21%

OACP vs. SMTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

OACP has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than SMTH's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

OACP vs. SMTH - Dividend Comparison

OACP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, which matches SMTH's 4.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
OACP OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF	4.36%	4.46%	4.51%	3.87%	2.34%
SMTH ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF	4.39%	4.46%	4.58%	0.24%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OACP and SMTH in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, OACP and SMTH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, OACP or SMTH?

SMTH has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to OACP (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OACP dropped -11.81% vs SMTH's -4.11%.

Which ETF is better, OACP or SMTH?

On 1-year performance, OACP leads with 4.60% vs 4.39% for SMTH. On fees, SMTH is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, OACP has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OACP or SMTH?

Over the 1-year period, OACP has performed better with a 4.60% return vs 4.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OACP or SMTH?

SMTH is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for OACP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OACP or SMTH?

SMTH has the higher dividend yield at 4.39%, compared with 4.36% for OACP.

What is the main difference between OACP and SMTH?

They also come from different issuers: Oneascent and ALPS. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for OACP and 0.59% for SMTH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.