PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
OACP vs. PRPFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

OACP vs. PRPFX

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

OACP (OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF) and PRPFX (Permanent Portfolio Class I) are both funds - OACP is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Oneascent, while PRPFX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Permanent Portfolio. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, OACP returned 4.68%/yr vs 19.77%/yr for PRPFX. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OACP charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for PRPFX.

Performance

OACP vs. PRPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) and Permanent Portfolio Class I (PRPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OACP achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than PRPFX's 3.05% return.

OACP

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.32%
YTD
0.28%
6M
0.68%
1Y
4.97%
3Y*
4.68%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

PRPFX

1D
0.64%
1M
-2.53%
YTD
3.05%
6M
4.38%
1Y
17.66%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
10.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OACP vs. PRPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
OACP
OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF		0.28%7.17%2.37%6.04%-7.87%
PRPFX
Permanent Portfolio Class I		3.05%28.78%19.36%11.96%-6.70%

Correlation

The correlation between OACP and PRPFX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2022

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF

Permanent Portfolio Class I

Often compared with OACP:
OACP vs. UCONOACP vs. CFITOACP vs. APCBOACP vs. ZHOGOACP vs. KDRNOACP vs. BNDPOACP vs. OALC
Often compared with PRPFX:
PRPFX vs. SPYPRPFX vs. ALLWPRPFX vs. ^GSPCPRPFX vs. VOOPRPFX vs. VFINXPRPFX vs. FPURXPRPFX vs. MOGAX

Return for Risk

OACP vs. PRPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
OACP
OACP Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
OACP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OACP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
OACP Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
OACP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
OACP Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
PRPFX
PRPFX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PRPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PRPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OACP vs. PRPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) and Permanent Portfolio Class I (PRPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

OACPPRPFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.35
1.45

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.99
1.81

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.29

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

2.20

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.13

5.95

-0.82

OACP vs. PRPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OACP Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the PRPFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OACP and PRPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OACP vs. PRPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OACP drawdown since its inception was -11.81%, smaller than the maximum PRPFX drawdown of -27.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OACP and PRPFX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

OACPPRPFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.81%

-27.16%

+15.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.60%

-8.40%

+5.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.89%

-8.40%

+2.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-15.49%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-20.84%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-7.81%

+6.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.58%

-3.52%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

3.10%

-2.18%

Volatility

OACP vs. PRPFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) is 1.25%, while Permanent Portfolio Class I (PRPFX) has a volatility of 3.64%. This indicates that OACP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

OACPPRPFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

3.64%

-2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.64%

11.59%

-8.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.53%

12.79%

-9.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.80%

11.13%

-5.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.80%

10.65%

-4.85%

OACP vs. PRPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OACP has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than PRPFX's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

OACP vs. PRPFX - Dividend Comparison

OACP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, more than PRPFX's 3.17% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OACP
OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF		4.37%4.46%4.51%3.87%2.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRPFX
Permanent Portfolio Class I		3.17%3.27%1.86%1.39%1.58%2.05%5.38%4.69%6.90%2.14%0.95%7.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

OACP and PRPFX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRPFX has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to OACP (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OACP dropped -11.81% vs PRPFX's -27.16%.

PRPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OACP and PRPFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer