OACP vs. OASC
OACP (OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF) and OASC (OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OACP is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Oneascent, while OASC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Oneascent. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OACP returned 5.47% vs 36.18% for OASC. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OACP charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for OASC.
Performance
OACP vs. OASC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OACP achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly lower than OASC's 16.43% return.
OACP
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 0.04%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- 1Y
- 5.47%
- 3Y*
- 4.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OASC
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 3.98%
- YTD
- 16.43%
- 6M
- 17.89%
- 1Y
- 36.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OACP vs. OASC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
OACP OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.04% | 7.17% | 1.44% |
OASC OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF | 16.43% | 8.91% | 10.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between OACP and OASC is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2024 | 0.27 |
OACP vs. OASC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OACP
OASC
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
OACP
OASC
Basic Materials
OACP
-
OASC
Communication Services
OACP
-
OASC
Consumer Cyclical
OACP
-
OASC
Consumer Defensive
OACP
-
OASC
Energy
OACP
-
OASC
Healthcare
OACP
-
OASC
Industrials
OACP
-
OASC
Real Estate
OACP
-
OASC
Technology
OACP
-
OASC
Utilities
OACP
-
OASC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OACP vs. OASC — Risk / Return Rank
OACP
OASC
OACP vs. OASC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) and OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF (OASC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OACP | OASC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.34 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 4.74 | -2.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.18 | 15.82 | -9.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OACP | OASC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 2.02 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.90 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
OACP vs. OASC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OACP drawdown since its inception was -11.81%, smaller than the maximum OASC drawdown of -27.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OACP and OASC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OACP | OASC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.81% | -27.00% | +15.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.60% | -7.67% | +5.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | -0.70% | -0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.60% | -6.06% | +2.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | 2.29% | -1.40% |
Volatility
OACP vs. OASC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) is 1.26%, while OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF (OASC) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that OACP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OASC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OACP | OASC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.26% | 5.13% | -3.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.57% | 12.22% | -9.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.54% | 18.04% | -14.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.81% | 20.95% | -15.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.81% | 20.95% | -15.14% |
OACP vs. OASC - Expense Ratio Comparison
OACP has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than OASC's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
OACP vs. OASC - Dividend Comparison
OACP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, more than OASC's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OACP OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF | 4.38% | 4.46% | 4.51% | 3.87% | 2.34% |
OASC OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OACP and OASC have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OASC has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to OACP (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OACP dropped -11.81% vs OASC's -27.00%.
On 1-year performance, OASC leads with 36.18% vs 5.47% for OACP. On fees, OASC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, OACP has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OASC has performed better with a 36.18% return vs 5.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OASC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for OACP.
OACP has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 0.46% for OASC.
OACP is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while OASC is Small Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for OACP and 0.69% for OASC.
OASC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OACP and OASC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer