OACP vs. OASC

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

OACP (OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF) and OASC (OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OACP is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Oneascent, while OASC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Oneascent. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OACP returned 2.63% vs 36.05% for OASC. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. OACP charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for OASC.

Performance

OACP vs. OASC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) and OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF (OASC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OACP achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than OASC's 19.65% return.

OACP

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: -0.63%
• 6M: -0.13%
• YTD: -0.02%
• 1Y: 2.63%
• 3Y*: 4.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 1.60%

OASC

• 1D: 2.10%
• 1M: 1.00%
• 6M: 15.46%
• YTD: 19.65%
• 1Y: 36.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
OACP OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF	$1.40M	$1.13M	$1.14M
OASC OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF	$273.96K	$500.38K	$402.45K

OACP vs. OASC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
OACP OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF	-0.02%	7.17%	2.09%
OASC OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF	19.65%	8.91%	10.35%

Correlation

The correlation between OACP and OASC is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2024	0.28

Return for Risk

OACP vs. OASC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OACP

OACP Risk / Return Rank: 27
OACP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
OACP Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
OACP Omega Ratio Rank: 26
OACP Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
OACP Martin Ratio Rank: 27

OASC

OASC Risk / Return Rank: 81
OASC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
OASC Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
OASC Omega Ratio Rank: 71
OASC Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
OASC Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OACP vs. OASC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) and OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF (OASC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OACP	OASC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	1.96	-1.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.10	2.87	-1.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.34	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.02	4.72	-3.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.49	14.51	-12.02

OACP vs. OASC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OACP Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the OASC Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OACP and OASC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OACP vs. OASC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OACP drawdown since its inception was -11.81%, smaller than the maximum OASC drawdown of -27.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OACP and OASC.

Drawdown Indicators

	OACP	OASC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.81%	-27.00%	+15.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.60%	-7.67%	+5.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.55%	-1.96%	+0.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.51%	-5.77%	+2.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.06%	2.49%	-1.43%

Volatility

OACP vs. OASC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) is 1.15%, while OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF (OASC) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that OACP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OASC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OACP	OASC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.15%	5.49%	-4.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.82%	13.58%	-10.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.44%	18.54%	-15.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.74%	20.82%	-15.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.74%	20.82%	-15.08%

OACP vs. OASC - Expense Ratio Comparison

OACP has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than OASC's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

OACP vs. OASC - Dividend Comparison

OACP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than OASC's 0.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
OACP OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF	4.41%	4.46%	4.51%	3.87%	2.34%
OASC OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF	0.45%	0.53%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OACP and OASC in my portfolio?

OACP and OASC have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OACP or OASC?

OASC has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to OACP (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OACP dropped -11.81% vs OASC's -27.00%.

Which ETF is better, OACP or OASC?

On 1-year performance, OASC leads with 36.05% vs 2.63% for OACP. On fees, OASC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, OACP has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OACP or OASC?

Over the 1-year period, OASC has performed better with a 36.05% return vs 2.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OACP or OASC?

OASC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for OACP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OACP or OASC?

OACP has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 0.45% for OASC.

What is the main difference between OACP and OASC?

OACP is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while OASC is Small Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for OACP and 0.69% for OASC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OASC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.