OACP vs. DCMT

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

OACP (OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF) and DCMT (DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OACP is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Oneascent, while DCMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by DoubleLine. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OACP returned 2.63% vs 29.63% for DCMT. Their -0.21 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. OACP charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DCMT.

Performance

OACP vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OACP achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 24.74% return.

OACP

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: -0.63%
• 6M: -0.13%
• YTD: -0.02%
• 1Y: 2.63%
• 3Y*: 4.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 1.60%

DCMT

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: 6.02%
• 6M: 16.61%
• YTD: 24.74%
• 1Y: 29.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	$307.72K	$268.91K	$199.57K
OACP OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF	$1.40M	$1.13M	$1.14M

OACP vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
OACP OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF	-0.02%	7.17%	2.43%
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	24.74%	6.04%	3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between OACP and DCMT is -0.38, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024	-0.21

The correlation between OACP and DCMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.38 (1 year) to -0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

OACP vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OACP

OACP Risk / Return Rank: 27
OACP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
OACP Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
OACP Omega Ratio Rank: 26
OACP Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
OACP Martin Ratio Rank: 27

DCMT

DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 52
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 53
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OACP vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OACP	DCMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	1.56	-0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.10	2.16	-1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.27	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.02	1.86	-0.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.49	6.16	-3.68

OACP vs. DCMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OACP Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the DCMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OACP and DCMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OACP vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OACP drawdown since its inception was -11.81%, smaller than the maximum DCMT drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OACP and DCMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	OACP	DCMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.81%	-15.96%	+4.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.60%	-15.96%	+13.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.55%	-10.46%	+8.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.51%	-3.63%	+0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.06%	4.82%	-3.76%

Volatility

OACP vs. DCMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) is 1.15%, while DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) has a volatility of 5.57%. This indicates that OACP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OACP	DCMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.15%	5.57%	-4.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.82%	16.66%	-13.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.44%	19.04%	-15.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.74%	16.06%	-10.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.74%	16.06%	-10.32%

OACP vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

OACP has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

OACP vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison

OACP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than DCMT's 2.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	2.94%	3.67%	1.59%	0.00%	0.00%
OACP OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF	4.41%	4.46%	4.51%	3.87%	2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OACP and DCMT in my portfolio?

OACP and DCMT have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OACP or DCMT?

DCMT has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to OACP (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OACP dropped -11.81% vs DCMT's -15.96%.

Which ETF is better, OACP or DCMT?

On 1-year performance, DCMT leads with 29.63% vs 2.63% for OACP. On fees, DCMT is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, OACP has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OACP or DCMT?

Over the 1-year period, DCMT has performed better with a 29.63% return vs 2.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OACP or DCMT?

DCMT is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for OACP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OACP or DCMT?

OACP has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 2.94% for DCMT.

What is the main difference between OACP and DCMT?

OACP is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while DCMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Oneascent and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for OACP and 0.66% for DCMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DCMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.