O vs. XLM-USD
O (Realty Income Corporation) is a stock, while XLM-USD (Stellar) is a cryptocurrency. Over the past 10 years, O returned 4.89%/yr vs 60.23%/yr for XLM-USD. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
O vs. XLM-USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, O achieves a 13.70% return, which is significantly higher than XLM-USD's -6.87% return. Over the past 10 years, O has underperformed XLM-USD with an annualized return of 4.89%, while XLM-USD has yielded a comparatively higher 60.23% annualized return.
O
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- YTD
- 13.70%
- 6M
- 11.57%
- 1Y
- 14.88%
- 3Y*
- 6.59%
- 5Y*
- 3.49%
- 10Y*
- 4.89%
XLM-USD
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 15.17%
- YTD
- -6.87%
- 6M
- -21.39%
- 1Y
- -28.35%
- 3Y*
- 33.09%
- 5Y*
- -11.45%
- 10Y*
- 60.23%
O vs. XLM-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
O Realty Income Corporation | 13.70% | 12.20% | -2.11% | -4.55% | -7.38% | 23.95% | -11.60% | 21.27% | 15.94% | 3.67% |
XLM-USD Stellar | -6.87% | -39.55% | 157.40% | 81.66% | -73.35% | 108.68% | 184.76% | -60.36% | -68.37% | 14,396.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between O and XLM-USD is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2014 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
O vs. XLM-USD — Risk / Return Rank
O
XLM-USD
O vs. XLM-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Realty Income Corporation (O) and Stellar (XLM-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| O | XLM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.00 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | -0.40 | +1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.12 | -0.57 | +3.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
O vs. XLM-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum O drawdown since its inception was -48.45%, smaller than the maximum XLM-USD drawdown of -96.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for O and XLM-USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| O | XLM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.45% | -96.21% | +47.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.10% | -71.19% | +60.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.49% | -74.37% | +47.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.48% | -83.25% | +48.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.28% | -96.21% | +47.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.94% | -78.80% | +72.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -72.14% | +62.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.58% | 50.48% | -45.90% |
Volatility
O vs. XLM-USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Realty Income Corporation (O) is 5.29%, while Stellar (XLM-USD) has a volatility of 43.48%. This indicates that O experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLM-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| O | XLM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 43.48% | -38.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.98% | 59.28% | -47.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.21% | 70.60% | -54.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.92% | 74.72% | -55.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.64% | 112.79% | -87.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
O and XLM-USD have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLM-USD has higher volatility (43.48%) compared to O (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, O dropped -48.45% vs XLM-USD's -96.21%.
O currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for O and XLM-USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer