O vs. KRP
O (Realty Income Corporation) and KRP (Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP) are both stocks. O operates in REIT - Retail (Real Estate), while KRP operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 5 years, O returned 3.72%/yr vs 14.83%/yr for KRP. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
O vs. KRP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, O achieves a 9.20% return, which is significantly lower than KRP's 32.35% return.
O
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -2.79%
- YTD
- 9.20%
- 6M
- 9.80%
- 1Y
- 10.46%
- 3Y*
- 5.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.72%
- 10Y*
- 4.56%
KRP
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -2.31%
- YTD
- 32.35%
- 6M
- 37.01%
- 1Y
- 12.59%
- 3Y*
- 11.24%
- 5Y*
- 14.83%
- 10Y*
- —
O vs. KRP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
O Realty Income Corporation | 9.20% | 12.20% | -2.11% | -4.55% | -7.38% | 23.95% | -11.60% | 21.27% | 15.94% | -0.07% |
KRP Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP | 32.35% | -18.60% | 20.43% | 0.76% | 36.93% | 89.97% | -48.94% | 38.62% | -8.93% | -5.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between O and KRP is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2017 | 0.12 |
Fundamentals
O:
$1.17
KRP:
$0.60
O:
51.30
KRP:
24.59
O:
4.18
KRP:
0.09
O:
6.93
KRP:
5.71
O:
$5.92B
KRP:
$309.11M
O:
$3.89B
KRP:
$319.28M
O:
$3.93B
KRP:
$177.16M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
O vs. KRP — Risk / Return Rank
O
KRP
O vs. KRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Realty Income Corporation (O) and Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| O | KRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.11 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 0.62 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.23 | 1.58 | +0.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
O vs. KRP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum O drawdown since its inception was -48.45%, smaller than the maximum KRP drawdown of -80.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for O and KRP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| O | KRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.45% | -80.91% | +32.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.10% | -20.50% | +9.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.49% | -27.58% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.48% | -27.58% | -6.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.66% | -4.95% | -4.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -19.37% | +10.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.70% | 7.97% | -3.27% |
Volatility
O vs. KRP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Realty Income Corporation (O) is 5.70%, while Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) has a volatility of 6.60%. This indicates that O experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KRP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| O | KRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.70% | 6.60% | -0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.21% | 16.81% | -4.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.44% | 23.01% | -6.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.92% | 28.34% | -9.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 41.29% | -15.64% |
Dividends
O vs. KRP - Dividend Comparison
O's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.37%, less than KRP's 10.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRP Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP | 10.22% | 13.61% | 10.78% | 11.50% | 11.26% | 8.36% | 11.00% | 9.29% | 12.22% | 5.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
O Realty Income Corporation | 5.37% | 6.19% | 5.37% | 5.33% | 4.68% | 3.87% | 4.51% | 3.69% | 4.19% | 4.45% | 4.18% | 4.41% |
Financials
O vs. KRP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Realty Income Corporation and Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
O vs. KRP - Profitability Comparison
O - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Realty Income Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.55B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
KRP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP reported a gross profit of 59.66M and revenue of 65.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.0%.
O - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Realty Income Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.55B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
KRP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP reported an operating income of 15.80M and revenue of 65.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.1%.
O - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Realty Income Corporation reported a net income of -9.17M and revenue of 1.55B, resulting in a net margin of -0.6%.
KRP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP reported a net income of 3.97M and revenue of 65.54M, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
O and KRP have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KRP has higher volatility (6.60%) compared to O (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, O dropped -48.45% vs KRP's -80.91%.
O currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for O and KRP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer