PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
O vs. FCPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

O vs. FCPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Realty Income Corporation (O) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, O achieves a 13.70% return, which is significantly lower than FCPGX's 18.99% return. Over the past 10 years, O has underperformed FCPGX with an annualized return of 4.89%, while FCPGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.97% annualized return.


O

1D
1.31%
1M
3.07%
YTD
13.70%
6M
11.57%
1Y
14.88%
3Y*
6.59%
5Y*
3.49%
10Y*
4.89%

FCPGX

1D
4.26%
1M
3.64%
YTD
18.99%
6M
16.17%
1Y
39.09%
3Y*
20.10%
5Y*
7.60%
10Y*
14.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

O vs. FCPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
O
Realty Income Corporation
13.70%12.20%-2.11%-4.55%-7.38%23.95%-11.60%21.27%15.94%3.67%
FCPGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund
18.99%11.20%20.56%19.02%-25.34%10.50%36.41%36.31%-4.57%28.99%

Correlation

The correlation between O and FCPGX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2004

0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between O and FCPGX has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

O vs. FCPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

O
O Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
O Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
O Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
O Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
O Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
O Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FCPGX
FCPGX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FCPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FCPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

O vs. FCPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Realty Income Corporation (O) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OFCPGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.28

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

2.80

-1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.12

11.15

-8.03

O vs. FCPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current O Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the FCPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of O and FCPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

O vs. FCPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum O drawdown since its inception was -48.45%, smaller than the maximum FCPGX drawdown of -59.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for O and FCPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OFCPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.45%

-59.11%

+10.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.10%

-13.12%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.49%

-28.69%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.48%

-39.04%

+4.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.28%

-39.04%

-9.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.94%

-0.19%

-5.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-10.69%

+1.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.58%

3.29%

+1.29%

Volatility

O vs. FCPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Realty Income Corporation (O) is 5.29%, while Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) has a volatility of 8.73%. This indicates that O experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OFCPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

8.73%

-3.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.98%

17.37%

-5.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.21%

22.11%

-5.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.92%

23.65%

-4.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.64%

22.92%

+2.72%

Dividends

O vs. FCPGX - Dividend Comparison

O's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, less than FCPGX's 5.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCPGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund
5.37%6.38%1.37%0.00%0.00%19.27%8.19%5.31%14.35%6.88%1.53%4.32%
O
Realty Income Corporation
5.16%6.19%5.37%5.33%4.68%3.87%4.51%3.69%4.19%4.45%4.18%4.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


O and FCPGX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCPGX has higher volatility (8.73%) compared to O (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, O dropped -48.45% vs FCPGX's -59.11%.

FCPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for O and FCPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer