PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NZUS vs. VV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NZUS vs. VV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZUS) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NZUS achieves a 5.51% return, which is significantly lower than VV's 10.69% return.


NZUS

1D
0.00%
1M
2.81%
YTD
5.51%
6M
5.42%
1Y
20.11%
3Y*
20.11%
5Y*
10Y*

VV

1D
-0.72%
1M
5.19%
YTD
10.69%
6M
10.54%
1Y
27.77%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
13.54%
10Y*
15.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NZUS vs. VV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NZUS
SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF
5.51%13.95%24.34%29.16%-14.34%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
10.69%18.11%25.25%27.18%-12.32%

Correlation

The correlation between NZUS and VV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2022

0.97

The correlation between NZUS and VV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

NZUS vs. VV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NZUS
VV

Technology

45.3%
35.9%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.8%

Real Estate

10.5%
1.7%

Communication Services

9.7%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
9.8%

Healthcare

7.8%
8.6%

Industrials

2.1%
8.0%

Utilities

1.6%
2.7%

Energy

0.8%
3.6%

Basic Materials

0.5%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.8%

Technology

NZUS
45.3%
VV
35.9%

Financial Services

NZUS
11.9%
VV
11.8%

Real Estate

NZUS
10.5%
VV
1.7%

Communication Services

NZUS
9.7%
VV
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

NZUS
9.5%
VV
9.8%

Healthcare

NZUS
7.8%
VV
8.6%

Industrials

NZUS
2.1%
VV
8.0%

Utilities

NZUS
1.6%
VV
2.7%

Energy

NZUS
0.8%
VV
3.6%

Basic Materials

NZUS
0.5%
VV
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

NZUS

-

VV
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NZUS vs. VV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NZUS
NZUS Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
NZUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NZUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
NZUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
NZUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
NZUS Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

VV
VV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NZUS vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZUS) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NZUSVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.42

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

3.03

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.83

13.86

-7.02

NZUS vs. VV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NZUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the VV Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NZUS and VV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NZUSVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

2.33

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.59

+0.11

Drawdowns

NZUS vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NZUS drawdown since its inception was -20.99%, smaller than the maximum VV drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NZUS and VV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NZUSVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.99%

-54.81%

+33.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-9.21%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.99%

-18.97%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.72%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-6.84%

+2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

2.01%

+1.35%

Volatility

NZUS vs. VV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZUS) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) have volatilities of 2.83% and 2.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NZUSVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

2.84%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.09%

8.98%

+1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.27%

11.99%

+1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.61%

17.22%

+1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.61%

18.19%

+0.42%

NZUS vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NZUS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NZUS vs. VV - Dividend Comparison

NZUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than VV's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NZUS
SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF
0.60%0.89%5.49%1.07%1.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
0.98%1.08%1.24%1.41%1.66%1.19%1.46%1.81%2.09%1.75%1.98%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, NZUS and VV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VV has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to NZUS (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NZUS dropped -20.99% vs VV's -54.81%.

On 3-year performance, VV leads with 22.68% vs 20.11% for NZUS. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VV has performed better with a 22.68% return vs 20.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for NZUS.

VV has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.60% for NZUS.

NZUS tracks MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Index, while VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for NZUS and 0.04% for VV.

VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NZUS and VV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer