NZUS vs. VV
NZUS (SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF) and VV (Vanguard Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - NZUS tracks the MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Index while VV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NZUS returned 20.11%/yr vs 22.68%/yr for VV. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. NZUS charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VV.
Performance
NZUS vs. VV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NZUS achieves a 5.51% return, which is significantly lower than VV's 10.69% return.
NZUS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- 5.51%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- 1Y
- 20.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VV
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 10.69%
- 6M
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 27.77%
- 3Y*
- 22.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.54%
- 10Y*
- 15.58%
NZUS vs. VV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NZUS SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF | 5.51% | 13.95% | 24.34% | 29.16% | -14.34% |
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 10.69% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.18% | -12.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between NZUS and VV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2022 | 0.97 |
The correlation between NZUS and VV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
NZUS vs. VV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NZUS
VV
Technology
Financial Services
Real Estate
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
NZUS
VV
Financial Services
NZUS
VV
Real Estate
NZUS
VV
Communication Services
NZUS
VV
Consumer Cyclical
NZUS
VV
Healthcare
NZUS
VV
Industrials
NZUS
VV
Utilities
NZUS
VV
Energy
NZUS
VV
Basic Materials
NZUS
VV
Consumer Defensive
NZUS
-
VV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NZUS vs. VV — Risk / Return Rank
NZUS
VV
NZUS vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZUS) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NZUS | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.42 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 3.03 | -1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.83 | 13.86 | -7.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NZUS | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 2.33 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.59 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
NZUS vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NZUS drawdown since its inception was -20.99%, smaller than the maximum VV drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NZUS and VV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NZUS | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.99% | -54.81% | +33.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -9.21% | -3.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.99% | -18.97% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -0.72% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -6.84% | +2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 2.01% | +1.35% |
Volatility
NZUS vs. VV - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZUS) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) have volatilities of 2.83% and 2.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NZUS | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 2.84% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.09% | 8.98% | +1.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.27% | 11.99% | +1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.61% | 17.22% | +1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.61% | 18.19% | +0.42% |
NZUS vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison
NZUS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NZUS vs. VV - Dividend Comparison
NZUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than VV's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NZUS SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF | 0.60% | 0.89% | 5.49% | 1.07% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 0.98% | 1.08% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.19% | 1.46% | 1.81% | 2.09% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, NZUS and VV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VV has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to NZUS (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NZUS dropped -20.99% vs VV's -54.81%.
On 3-year performance, VV leads with 22.68% vs 20.11% for NZUS. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VV has performed better with a 22.68% return vs 20.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for NZUS.
VV has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.60% for NZUS.
NZUS tracks MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Index, while VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for NZUS and 0.04% for VV.
VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NZUS and VV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer