PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NZUS vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NZUS vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZUS) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NZUS vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NZUS
SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF
-8.31%13.95%24.34%29.16%-14.34%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
8.57%64.20%27.08%13.04%-7.94%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NZUS achieves a -8.31% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 8.57% return.


NZUS

1D
3.30%
1M
-4.09%
YTD
-8.31%
6M
-6.15%
1Y
12.87%
3Y*
15.43%
5Y*
10Y*

GLDM

1D
3.77%
1M
-10.99%
YTD
8.57%
6M
21.24%
1Y
49.77%
3Y*
33.33%
5Y*
21.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NZUS vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NZUS and GLDM have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

NZUS vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NZUS
NZUS Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
NZUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NZUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
NZUS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
NZUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
NZUS Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NZUS vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZUS) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NZUSGLDMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.66

1.82

-1.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.10

2.25

-1.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.33

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

2.71

-1.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.76

10.04

-6.29

NZUS vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NZUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NZUS and GLDM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NZUSGLDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

1.82

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

1.09

-0.58

Correlation

The correlation between NZUS and GLDM is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NZUS vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

NZUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022
NZUS
SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF
0.98%0.89%5.49%1.07%1.22%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NZUS vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NZUS drawdown since its inception was -20.99%, roughly equal to the maximum GLDM drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NZUS and GLDM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NZUSGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.99%

-21.63%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.44%

-19.14%

+6.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.54%

-13.19%

+3.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-6.04%

+1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

5.16%

-1.57%

Volatility

NZUS vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZUS) is 5.76%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 11.01%. This indicates that NZUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NZUSGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.76%

11.01%

-5.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.42%

24.07%

-13.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.57%

27.57%

-8.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.78%

17.65%

+1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

16.77%

+2.01%