PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NZF vs. FASEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NZF vs. FASEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund (NZF) and Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NZF achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than FASEX's 19.56% return. Over the past 10 years, NZF has underperformed FASEX with an annualized return of 3.16%, while FASEX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.00% annualized return.


NZF

1D
-0.73%
1M
-2.79%
6M
1.93%
YTD
1.35%
1Y
10.90%
3Y*
8.45%
5Y*
-1.05%
10Y*
3.16%
ALL TIME*
5.28%

FASEX

1D
0.70%
1M
-0.26%
6M
14.33%
YTD
19.56%
1Y
28.65%
3Y*
14.01%
5Y*
9.89%
10Y*
11.00%
ALL TIME*
9.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$6.09M$6.45M$6.65M

NZF vs. FASEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NZF
Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund
1.35%11.78%10.09%2.49%-25.53%11.19%3.58%28.33%-6.79%14.48%
FASEX
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund
19.56%9.68%10.40%14.20%-10.63%34.84%1.19%26.68%-13.00%19.23%

Correlation

The correlation between NZF and FASEX is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2001

0.15

The correlation between NZF and FASEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NZF vs. FASEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NZF
NZF Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
NZF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NZF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
NZF Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
NZF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
NZF Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FASEX
FASEX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FASEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FASEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NZF vs. FASEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund (NZF) and Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NZFFASEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.34

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

3.62

-2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.35

13.59

-7.24

NZF vs. FASEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NZF Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the FASEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NZF and FASEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NZF vs. FASEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NZF drawdown since its inception was -48.55%, smaller than the maximum FASEX drawdown of -55.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NZF and FASEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NZFFASEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.55%

-55.57%

+7.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.11%

-7.37%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.54%

-22.26%

+8.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.42%

-22.26%

-15.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.42%

-44.56%

+7.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.67%

-1.61%

-4.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.75%

-8.90%

+1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.99%

-0.02%

Volatility

NZF vs. FASEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund (NZF) is 2.12%, while Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX) has a volatility of 3.53%. This indicates that NZF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NZFFASEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.12%

3.53%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.08%

10.40%

-2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.58%

13.88%

-3.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.39%

17.95%

-5.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.09%

20.14%

-7.05%

NZF vs. FASEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NZF has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FASEX's 1.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

NZF vs. FASEX - Dividend Comparison

NZF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.82%, less than FASEX's 12.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASEX
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund
12.27%14.67%5.29%3.12%6.32%4.02%1.06%0.89%4.48%7.93%3.67%3.49%
NZF
Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund
7.82%7.58%6.84%4.51%5.80%4.63%4.74%4.82%6.05%5.86%6.26%5.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


NZF and FASEX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FASEX has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to NZF (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NZF dropped -48.55% vs FASEX's -55.57%.

FASEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NZF and FASEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer