NZF vs. NAD
NZF (Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund) is Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P National Municipal Bond Index, while NAD (Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, NZF returned 3.16%/yr vs 2.55%/yr for NAD. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
NZF vs. NAD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NZF achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than NAD's 1.52% return. Over the past 10 years, NZF has outperformed NAD with an annualized return of 3.16%, while NAD has yielded a comparatively lower 2.55% annualized return.
NZF
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -2.79%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 1Y
- 10.90%
- 3Y*
- 8.45%
- 5Y*
- -1.05%
- 10Y*
- 3.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.28%
NAD
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 1Y
- 12.21%
- 3Y*
- 8.51%
- 5Y*
- -0.69%
- 10Y*
- 2.55%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.01M | $6.97M | $7.32M | |
| $6.09M | $6.45M | $6.65M |
NZF vs. NAD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NZF Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund | 1.35% | 11.78% | 10.09% | 2.49% | -25.53% | 11.19% | 3.58% | 28.33% | -6.79% | 14.48% |
NAD Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund | 1.52% | 11.29% | 8.74% | 1.26% | -22.85% | 9.70% | 10.33% | 21.92% | -6.10% | 6.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between NZF and NAD is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2001 | 0.57 |
The correlation between NZF and NAD shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.80 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NZF vs. NAD — Risk / Return Rank
NZF
NAD
NZF vs. NAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund (NZF) and Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NZF | NAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.23 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 1.59 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.35 | 6.09 | +0.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NZF vs. NAD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NZF drawdown since its inception was -48.55%, which is greater than NAD's maximum drawdown of -44.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NZF and NAD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NZF | NAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.55% | -44.65% | -3.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.11% | -8.08% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.54% | -12.14% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.42% | -35.58% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.42% | -35.58% | -1.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.67% | -4.53% | -1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.75% | -7.80% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 2.11% | -0.14% |
Volatility
NZF vs. NAD - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund (NZF) has a higher volatility of 2.12% compared to Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAD) at 1.66%. This indicates that NZF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NAD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NZF | NAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.12% | 1.66% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.08% | 9.31% | -1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.58% | 11.02% | -0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.39% | 11.63% | +0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.09% | 11.91% | +1.18% |
Dividends
NZF vs. NAD - Dividend Comparison
NZF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.82%, more than NAD's 7.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAD Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund | 7.27% | 7.37% | 6.63% | 4.13% | 5.58% | 4.43% | 4.41% | 4.40% | 5.37% | 5.42% | 6.05% | 5.96% |
NZF Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund | 7.82% | 7.58% | 6.84% | 4.51% | 5.80% | 4.63% | 4.74% | 4.82% | 6.05% | 5.86% | 6.26% | 5.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NZF and NAD have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NZF has higher volatility (2.12%) compared to NAD (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NZF dropped -48.55% vs NAD's -44.65%.
NZF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NZF and NAD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer