NZAC vs. GEQT.TO
NZAC (SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF) and GEQT.TO (iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio) are both Global Equities funds. NZAC is passively managed, while GEQT.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, NZAC returned 9.39%/yr vs 10.99%/yr for GEQT.TO. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NZAC charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GEQT.TO.
Performance
NZAC vs. GEQT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NZAC is traded in USD, while GEQT.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the GEQT.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NZAC achieves a 6.77% return, which is significantly lower than GEQT.TO's 12.02% return.
NZAC
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- YTD
- 6.77%
- 6M
- 7.70%
- 1Y
- 22.02%
- 3Y*
- 17.54%
- 5Y*
- 9.39%
- 10Y*
- 12.28%
GEQT.TO
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 26.61%
- 3Y*
- 20.49%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- —
NZAC vs. GEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF | 6.77% | 20.55% | 16.67% | 23.22% | -19.77% | 18.35% | 10.41% |
GEQT.TO iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio | 12.02% | 23.49% | 15.63% | 25.34% | -20.25% | 22.05% | 9.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between NZAC and GEQT.TO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2020 | 0.57 |
The correlation between NZAC and GEQT.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NZAC vs. GEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
NZAC
GEQT.TO
NZAC vs. GEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NZAC | GEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.31 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 2.42 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.62 | 10.35 | -1.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NZAC vs. GEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NZAC drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, which is greater than GEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -30.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NZAC and GEQT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NZAC | GEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.72% | -30.45% | -3.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.10% | -10.59% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.19% | -18.97% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.31% | -30.45% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.70% | -1.70% | -1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.32% | -6.88% | +1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 2.47% | -0.08% |
Volatility
NZAC vs. GEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) is 5.07%, while iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that NZAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NZAC | GEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.07% | 5.82% | -0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.12% | 12.72% | -1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.56% | 15.19% | -1.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 18.89% | -1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 18.64% | -1.47% |
NZAC vs. GEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NZAC has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GEQT.TO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NZAC vs. GEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison
NZAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than GEQT.TO's 1.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEQT.TO iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio | 1.11% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.32% | 0.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF | 2.08% | 1.90% | 1.88% | 1.65% | 1.81% | 1.62% | 1.59% | 2.17% | 2.53% | 2.20% | 2.00% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NZAC and GEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NZAC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NZAC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GEQT.TO.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for NZAC and 0.25% for GEQT.TO.
Find the right allocation for NZAC and GEQT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer