GEQT.TO vs. GBAL.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO) and iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio (GBAL.TO).
GEQT.TO and GBAL.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GEQT.TO is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Sep 2, 2020. GBAL.TO is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Sep 2, 2020.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GEQT.TO or GBAL.TO.
Key characteristics
| GEQT.TO | GBAL.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 19.97% | 14.19% |
| 1Y Return | 30.47% | 22.45% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.76% | 5.09% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.47 | 2.39 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.92% | 9.12% |
| Max Drawdown | -23.64% | -18.92% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.20% | -2.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between GEQT.TO and GBAL.TO is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GEQT.TO vs. GBAL.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GEQT.TO achieves a 19.97% return, which is significantly higher than GBAL.TO's 14.19% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GEQT.TO vs. GBAL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GEQT.TO and GBAL.TO have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GEQT.TO vs. GBAL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO) and iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio (GBAL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GEQT.TO vs. GBAL.TO - Dividend Comparison
GEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than GBAL.TO's 2.18% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEQT.TO iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio | 1.42% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.32% | 0.87% |
GBAL.TO iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio | 2.18% | 2.40% | 1.87% | 1.44% | 0.96% |
Drawdowns
GEQT.TO vs. GBAL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.64%, which is greater than GBAL.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEQT.TO and GBAL.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GEQT.TO vs. GBAL.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO) is 4.17%, while iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio (GBAL.TO) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that GEQT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBAL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.