NZAC vs. GBLD
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF (GBLD).
NZAC and GBLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NZAC is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned Index. It was launched on Nov 25, 2014. GBLD is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI Global Green Building Index. It was launched on Apr 22, 2021. Both NZAC and GBLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
NZAC vs. GBLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NZAC vs. GBLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF | -4.15% | 20.55% | 16.67% | 23.22% | -19.77% | 9.23% |
GBLD Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF | 4.52% | 17.95% | -5.63% | 6.39% | -21.69% | -2.45% |
Returns By Period
NZAC
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- -4.15%
- 6M
- -2.11%
- 1Y
- 18.02%
- 3Y*
- 15.48%
- 5Y*
- 8.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.95%
GBLD
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NZAC vs. GBLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
NZAC has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GBLD's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NZAC vs. GBLD — Risk / Return Rank
NZAC
GBLD
NZAC vs. GBLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF (GBLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NZAC | GBLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.57 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.14 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NZAC | GBLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between NZAC and GBLD is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
NZAC vs. GBLD - Dividend Comparison
NZAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than GBLD's 3.45% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF | 1.98% | 1.90% | 1.88% | 1.65% | 1.81% | 1.62% | 1.59% | 2.17% | 2.53% | 2.20% | 2.00% | 2.40% |
GBLD Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF | 3.45% | 3.27% | 5.34% | 6.60% | 3.79% | 3.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
NZAC vs. GBLD - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NZAC | GBLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.21% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.39% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | — | — |
Volatility
NZAC vs. GBLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NZAC | GBLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.20% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.12% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.94% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.73% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.09% | — | — |