PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NZAC vs. VSGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NZAC vs. VSGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF (VSGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NZAC achieves a 9.73% return, which is significantly lower than VSGX's 16.92% return.


NZAC

1D
0.56%
1M
4.72%
YTD
9.73%
6M
10.87%
1Y
26.10%
3Y*
19.38%
5Y*
10.26%
10Y*
12.25%

VSGX

1D
0.75%
1M
6.95%
YTD
16.92%
6M
20.03%
1Y
33.88%
3Y*
19.94%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NZAC vs. VSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NZAC
SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF
9.73%20.55%16.67%23.22%-19.77%18.35%17.21%28.24%-13.47%
VSGX
Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF
16.92%30.77%5.72%15.62%-18.61%7.24%13.01%23.04%-12.87%

Correlation

The correlation between NZAC and VSGX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2018

0.89

The correlation between NZAC and VSGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

NZAC vs. VSGX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NZAC
VSGX

Technology

34.3%
23.9%

Financial Services

13.1%
27.9%

Communication Services

8.5%
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
9.5%

Healthcare

7.8%
9.4%

Industrials

7.3%
9.8%

Real Estate

5.2%
3.2%

Basic Materials

1.9%
6.1%

Utilities

1.4%
0.7%

Energy

1.2%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
5.1%

Technology

NZAC
34.3%
VSGX
23.9%

Financial Services

NZAC
13.1%
VSGX
27.9%

Communication Services

NZAC
8.5%
VSGX
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

NZAC
8.2%
VSGX
9.5%

Healthcare

NZAC
7.8%
VSGX
9.4%

Industrials

NZAC
7.3%
VSGX
9.8%

Real Estate

NZAC
5.2%
VSGX
3.2%

Basic Materials

NZAC
1.9%
VSGX
6.1%

Utilities

NZAC
1.4%
VSGX
0.7%

Energy

NZAC
1.2%
VSGX
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

NZAC
1.0%
VSGX
5.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NZAC vs. VSGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NZAC
NZAC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
NZAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NZAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
NZAC Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
NZAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
NZAC Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

VSGX
VSGX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NZAC vs. VSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF (VSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NZACVSGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.03

2.08

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.85

2.87

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.38

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

2.76

-0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.35

10.77

+0.58

NZAC vs. VSGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NZAC Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the VSGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NZAC and VSGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NZACVSGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

2.08

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.51

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.51

+0.10

Drawdowns

NZAC vs. VSGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NZAC drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, roughly equal to the maximum VSGX drawdown of -33.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NZAC and VSGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NZACVSGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.72%

-33.09%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.10%

-12.84%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.19%

-13.83%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.31%

-32.14%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-7.78%

+2.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

3.29%

-0.97%

Volatility

NZAC vs. VSGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) is 3.66%, while Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF (VSGX) has a volatility of 5.99%. This indicates that NZAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NZACVSGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

5.99%

-2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.33%

14.09%

-3.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.91%

16.38%

-3.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.81%

16.31%

+0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.14%

18.05%

-0.91%

NZAC vs. VSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NZAC and VSGX have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NZAC vs. VSGX - Dividend Comparison

NZAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than VSGX's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NZAC
SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF
2.02%1.90%1.88%1.65%1.81%1.62%1.59%2.17%2.53%2.20%2.00%2.40%
VSGX
Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF
2.82%3.23%3.10%2.77%2.61%2.49%1.67%2.28%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NZAC and VSGX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSGX has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to NZAC (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NZAC dropped -33.72% vs VSGX's -33.09%.

On 5-year performance, NZAC leads with 10.26% vs 8.22% for VSGX. Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. On volatility, NZAC has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NZAC has performed better with a 10.26% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NZAC and VSGX have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.

VSGX has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 2.02% for NZAC.

NZAC is categorized as Global Equities, while VSGX is Foreign Large Cap Equities. NZAC tracks MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned Index, while VSGX tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Choice Index.. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard.

VSGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NZAC and VSGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer