NZAC vs. FSST
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF (FSST).
NZAC and FSST are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NZAC is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned Index. It was launched on Nov 25, 2014. FSST is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Russell 3000. It was launched on Jun 15, 2021. Both NZAC and FSST are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
NZAC vs. FSST - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NZAC vs. FSST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF | -5.23% | 20.55% | 16.67% | 23.22% | -19.77% | 6.21% |
FSST Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF | 0.00% | 15.40% | 21.40% | 25.49% | -18.30% | 12.81% |
Returns By Period
NZAC
- 1D
- 3.15%
- 1M
- -5.91%
- YTD
- -5.23%
- 6M
- -2.63%
- 1Y
- 17.22%
- 3Y*
- 15.04%
- 5Y*
- 8.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
FSST
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NZAC vs. FSST - Expense Ratio Comparison
NZAC has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FSST's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NZAC vs. FSST — Risk / Return Rank
NZAC
FSST
NZAC vs. FSST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF (FSST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NZAC | FSST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.70 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NZAC | FSST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between NZAC and FSST is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NZAC vs. FSST - Dividend Comparison
NZAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, more than FSST's 0.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF | 2.01% | 1.90% | 1.88% | 1.65% | 1.81% | 1.62% | 1.59% | 2.17% | 2.53% | 2.20% | 2.00% | 2.40% |
FSST Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 2.01% | 0.68% | 1.00% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
NZAC vs. FSST - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NZAC | FSST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.27% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.39% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | — | — |
Volatility
NZAC vs. FSST - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NZAC | FSST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.07% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.91% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.73% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.09% | — | — |