PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NZAC vs. AVTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NZAC vs. AVTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF (AVTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NZAC

1D
0.56%
1M
4.72%
YTD
9.73%
6M
10.87%
1Y
26.10%
3Y*
19.38%
5Y*
10.26%
10Y*
12.25%

AVTM

1D
0.57%
1M
5.39%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NZAC vs. AVTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NZAC and AVTM is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026

0.97

NZAC vs. AVTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NZAC
AVTM

Technology

34.3%
31.0%

Financial Services

13.1%
16.6%

Communication Services

8.5%
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
11.0%

Healthcare

7.8%
6.4%

Industrials

7.3%
11.9%

Real Estate

5.2%
0.2%

Basic Materials

1.9%
2.7%

Utilities

1.4%
1.8%

Energy

1.2%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
4.2%

Technology

NZAC
34.3%
AVTM
31.0%

Financial Services

NZAC
13.1%
AVTM
16.6%

Communication Services

NZAC
8.5%
AVTM
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

NZAC
8.2%
AVTM
11.0%

Healthcare

NZAC
7.8%
AVTM
6.4%

Industrials

NZAC
7.3%
AVTM
11.9%

Real Estate

NZAC
5.2%
AVTM
0.2%

Basic Materials

NZAC
1.9%
AVTM
2.7%

Utilities

NZAC
1.4%
AVTM
1.8%

Energy

NZAC
1.2%
AVTM
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

NZAC
1.0%
AVTM
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NZAC vs. AVTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NZAC
NZAC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
NZAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NZAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
NZAC Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
NZAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
NZAC Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

AVTM
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NZAC vs. AVTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF (AVTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NZACAVTMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.35

NZAC vs. AVTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NZACAVTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

2.07

-1.45

Drawdowns

NZAC vs. AVTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NZAC drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, which is greater than AVTM's maximum drawdown of -9.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NZAC and AVTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NZACAVTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.72%

-9.21%

-24.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-2.10%

-3.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

Volatility

NZAC vs. AVTM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NZACAVTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.91%

15.92%

-3.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.81%

15.92%

+0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.14%

15.92%

+1.22%

NZAC vs. AVTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

NZAC has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than AVTM's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NZAC vs. AVTM - Dividend Comparison

NZAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than AVTM's 0.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVTM
Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF
0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NZAC
SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF
2.02%1.90%1.88%1.65%1.81%1.62%1.59%2.17%2.53%2.20%2.00%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, NZAC and AVTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, NZAC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NZAC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for AVTM.

NZAC has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 0.08% for AVTM.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for NZAC and 0.22% for AVTM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NZAC and AVTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer