AVTM vs. VT
AVTM (Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both Global Equities funds. AVTM is actively managed, while VT is passively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AVTM charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
AVTM vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AVTM
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VT
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- 10.06%
- 6M
- 9.32%
- 1Y
- 25.71%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- 10.51%
- 10Y*
- 12.96%
AVTM vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AVTM Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF | 7.33% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 6.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVTM and VT is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026 | 0.96 |
AVTM vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVTM
VT
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AVTM
VT
Financial Services
AVTM
VT
Industrials
AVTM
VT
Consumer Cyclical
AVTM
VT
Communication Services
AVTM
VT
Healthcare
AVTM
VT
Consumer Defensive
AVTM
VT
Energy
AVTM
VT
Basic Materials
AVTM
VT
Utilities
AVTM
VT
Real Estate
AVTM
VT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVTM vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
AVTM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VT
AVTM vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF (AVTM) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AVTM | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.67 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.57 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVTM vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVTM drawdown since its inception was -9.21%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVTM and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVTM | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.21% | -50.27% | +41.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | -2.80% | +0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.01% | -7.00% | +4.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.23% | — |
Volatility
AVTM vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVTM | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.50% | 13.58% | +2.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.50% | 16.19% | +0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.50% | 17.20% | -0.70% |
AVTM vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVTM has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AVTM vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
AVTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than VT's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVTM Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, AVTM and VT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for AVTM.
VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.28% for AVTM.
They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for AVTM and 0.06% for VT.
Find the right allocation for AVTM and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer