NYT vs. DVA
NYT (The New York Times Company) and DVA (DaVita Inc.) are both stocks. NYT operates in Publishing (Communication Services), while DVA operates in Medical Care Facilities (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, NYT returned 20.92%/yr vs 10.73%/yr for DVA. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NYT vs. DVA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NYT achieves a 4.39% return, which is significantly lower than DVA's 84.56% return. Over the past 10 years, NYT has outperformed DVA with an annualized return of 20.92%, while DVA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.73% annualized return.
NYT
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -3.84%
- YTD
- 4.39%
- 6M
- 2.76%
- 1Y
- 33.85%
- 3Y*
- 25.63%
- 5Y*
- 12.25%
- 10Y*
- 20.92%
DVA
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 5.62%
- YTD
- 84.56%
- 6M
- 79.97%
- 1Y
- 53.12%
- 3Y*
- 28.98%
- 5Y*
- 11.74%
- 10Y*
- 10.73%
NYT vs. DVA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NYT The New York Times Company | 4.39% | 35.06% | 7.33% | 52.60% | -32.16% | -6.18% | 61.92% | 45.26% | 21.35% | 40.50% |
DVA DaVita Inc. | 84.56% | -24.03% | 42.75% | 40.30% | -34.36% | -3.10% | 56.47% | 45.80% | -28.78% | 12.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between NYT and DVA is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 1995 | 0.22 |
The correlation between NYT and DVA shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.24 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NYT:
$2.33
DVA:
$13.07
NYT:
30.96
DVA:
16.05
NYT:
2.07
DVA:
2.50
NYT:
4.08
DVA:
0.91
NYT:
$2.90B
DVA:
$13.84B
NYT:
$1.49B
DVA:
$3.23B
NYT:
$573.11M
DVA:
$2.49B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NYT vs. DVA — Risk / Return Rank
NYT
DVA
NYT vs. DVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The New York Times Company (NYT) and DaVita Inc. (DVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NYT | DVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.30 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 1.70 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.26 | 3.80 | +1.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NYT vs. DVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NYT drawdown since its inception was -92.09%, roughly equal to the maximum DVA drawdown of -92.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYT and DVA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NYT | DVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.09% | -92.91% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.05% | -31.36% | +15.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.67% | -41.43% | +21.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.83% | -51.10% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.93% | -51.10% | +1.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.05% | -0.43% | -15.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.17% | -20.04% | -12.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.45% | 14.01% | -7.56% |
Volatility
NYT vs. DVA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The New York Times Company (NYT) is 6.01%, while DaVita Inc. (DVA) has a volatility of 7.45%. This indicates that NYT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NYT | DVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 7.45% | -1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.61% | 35.07% | -15.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.83% | 43.08% | -14.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.42% | 37.30% | -7.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.75% | 34.76% | -4.01% |
Dividends
NYT vs. DVA - Dividend Comparison
NYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, while DVA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVA DaVita Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NYT The New York Times Company | 1.07% | 0.97% | 0.96% | 0.86% | 1.05% | 0.56% | 0.44% | 0.59% | 0.72% | 0.86% | 1.20% | 1.19% |
Financials
NYT vs. DVA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The New York Times Company and DaVita Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NYT vs. DVA - Profitability Comparison
NYT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The New York Times Company reported a gross profit of 349.30M and revenue of 712.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.
DVA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DaVita Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NYT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The New York Times Company reported an operating income of 90.62M and revenue of 712.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.7%.
DVA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DaVita Inc. reported an operating income of 481.89M and revenue of 3.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.1%.
NYT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The New York Times Company reported a net income of 87.92M and revenue of 712.24M, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.
DVA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DaVita Inc. reported a net income of 197.53M and revenue of 3.42B, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NYT and DVA have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DVA has higher volatility (7.45%) compared to NYT (6.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NYT dropped -92.09% vs DVA's -92.91%.
DVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NYT and DVA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer