DVA vs. FMS
Compare and contrast key facts about DaVita Inc. (DVA) and Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DVA or FMS.
Correlation
The correlation between DVA and FMS is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
DVA vs. FMS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
DVA:
1.58
FMS:
0.46
DVA:
2.17
FMS:
0.89
DVA:
1.30
FMS:
1.11
DVA:
2.07
FMS:
0.23
DVA:
10.21
FMS:
1.80
DVA:
4.52%
FMS:
8.07%
DVA:
29.15%
FMS:
31.62%
DVA:
-92.91%
FMS:
-77.28%
DVA:
-9.59%
FMS:
-54.12%
Fundamentals
DVA:
$12.10B
FMS:
$13.97B
DVA:
$9.28
FMS:
$1.18
DVA:
15.90
FMS:
20.18
DVA:
1.11
FMS:
0.49
DVA:
$12.67B
FMS:
$19.24B
DVA:
$3.78B
FMS:
$4.84B
DVA:
$2.60B
FMS:
$3.19B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVA achieves a 44.95% return, which is significantly higher than FMS's 12.70% return. Over the past 10 years, DVA has outperformed FMS with an annualized return of 7.18%, while FMS has yielded a comparatively lower -3.09% annualized return.
DVA
44.95%
-5.92%
7.41%
44.95%
15.58%
7.18%
FMS
12.70%
4.68%
17.58%
11.79%
-6.56%
-3.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DVA vs. FMS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DaVita Inc. (DVA) and Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DVA vs. FMS - Dividend Comparison
DVA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVA DaVita Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FMS Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA | 2.78% | 2.97% | 4.34% | 2.57% | 1.70% | 1.78% | 1.95% | 0.98% | 1.04% | 1.05% | 1.44% | 1.38% |
Drawdowns
DVA vs. FMS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVA drawdown since its inception was -92.91%, which is greater than FMS's maximum drawdown of -77.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVA and FMS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DVA vs. FMS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DaVita Inc. (DVA) is 6.19%, while Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS) has a volatility of 7.79%. This indicates that DVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
DVA vs. FMS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DaVita Inc. and Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities