NYSX vs. RFDA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NYSX (Global X NYSE 100 ETF) and RFDA (RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. NYSX is passively managed, while RFDA is actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NYSX charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for RFDA.

Performance

NYSX vs. RFDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NYSE 100 ETF (NYSX) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NYSX

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 11.23%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RFDA

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 4.60%
• YTD: 12.65%
• 6M: 13.45%
• 1Y: 31.38%
• 3Y*: 19.75%
• 5Y*: 13.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NYSX vs. RFDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NYSX Global X NYSE 100 ETF	34.86%
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	14.14%

Correlation

The correlation between NYSX and RFDA is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026	0.37

Return for Risk

NYSX vs. RFDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFDA

RFDA Risk / Return Rank: 87
RFDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
RFDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
RFDA Omega Ratio Rank: 84
RFDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
RFDA Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NYSX vs. RFDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NYSE 100 ETF (NYSX) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NYSX	RFDA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	17.95	0.80	+17.15

Drawdowns

NYSX vs. RFDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NYSX drawdown since its inception was -3.46%, smaller than the maximum RFDA drawdown of -34.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYSX and RFDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	NYSX	RFDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.46%	-34.60%	+31.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.45%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.35%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.37%	0.00%	-1.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.52%	-3.74%	+3.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.49%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NYSX	RFDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.75%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.53%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.44%	11.67%	+9.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.44%	15.74%	+5.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.44%	16.85%	+4.59%

NYSX vs. RFDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

NYSX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than RFDA's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

NYSX vs. RFDA - Dividend Comparison

NYSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RFDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
NYSX Global X NYSE 100 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	1.75%	1.89%	2.23%	2.68%	3.57%	1.44%	1.62%	1.87%	2.44%	1.90%	0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NYSX and RFDA in my portfolio?

NYSX and RFDA have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NYSX or RFDA?

On fees, NYSX is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NYSX or RFDA?

NYSX is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for RFDA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NYSX or RFDA?

RFDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.00% for NYSX.

What is the main difference between NYSX and RFDA?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for NYSX and 0.52% for RFDA.