NYSX vs. RFDA
NYSX (Global X NYSE 100 ETF) and RFDA (RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. NYSX is passively managed, while RFDA is actively managed. Their 0.29 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NYSX charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for RFDA.
Performance
NYSX vs. RFDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NYSX
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
RFDA
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 12.44%
- YTD
- 14.14%
- 1Y
- 26.35%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- 12.90%
- 10Y*
- 13.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $239.29K | $212.13K | $467.73K | |
| $102.21K | $102.34K | $118.80K |
NYSX vs. RFDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NYSX Global X NYSE 100 ETF | 24.51% |
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF | 14.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between NYSX and RFDA is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NYSX vs. RFDA — Risk / Return Rank
NYSX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RFDA
NYSX vs. RFDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NYSE 100 ETF (NYSX) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NYSX | RFDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.47 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.99 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NYSX vs. RFDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NYSX drawdown since its inception was -13.45%, smaller than the maximum RFDA drawdown of -34.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYSX and RFDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NYSX | RFDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.45% | -34.60% | +21.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.69% | -0.84% | -7.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.11% | -3.70% | +0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.52% | — |
Volatility
NYSX vs. RFDA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NYSX | RFDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.48% | 11.76% | +15.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.48% | 15.72% | +11.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.48% | 16.84% | +10.64% |
NYSX vs. RFDA - Expense Ratio Comparison
NYSX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than RFDA's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
NYSX vs. RFDA - Dividend Comparison
NYSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than RFDA's 1.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NYSX Global X NYSE 100 ETF | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF | 1.77% | 1.89% | 2.23% | 2.68% | 3.57% | 1.44% | 1.62% | 1.87% | 2.44% | 1.90% | 0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NYSX and RFDA have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NYSX is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NYSX is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for RFDA.
RFDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.05% for NYSX.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for NYSX and 0.52% for RFDA.
Find the right allocation for NYSX and RFDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer