NYSX vs. QUS
NYSX (Global X NYSE 100 ETF) and QUS (SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - NYSX tracks the NYSE 100 Index while QUS tracks the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). Both are passively managed. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NYSX charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUS.
Performance
NYSX vs. QUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NYSX
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QUS
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 9.32%
- 1Y
- 18.81%
- 3Y*
- 16.09%
- 5Y*
- 10.75%
- 10Y*
- 13.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $239.29K | $212.13K | $467.73K | |
| $2.96M | $4.90M | $3.46M |
NYSX vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NYSX Global X NYSE 100 ETF | 24.51% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 10.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between NYSX and QUS is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NYSX vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank
NYSX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QUS
NYSX vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NYSE 100 ETF (NYSX) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NYSX | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.60 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.58 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NYSX vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NYSX drawdown since its inception was -13.45%, smaller than the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYSX and QUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NYSX | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.45% | -33.78% | +20.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.69% | -0.26% | -8.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.11% | -3.66% | +0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.53% | — |
Volatility
NYSX vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NYSX | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.48% | 9.24% | +18.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.48% | 14.32% | +13.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.48% | 16.39% | +11.09% |
NYSX vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
NYSX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NYSX vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison
NYSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than QUS's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NYSX Global X NYSE 100 ETF | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.28% | 1.38% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NYSX and QUS have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NYSX is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NYSX is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QUS.
QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.05% for NYSX.
NYSX tracks NYSE 100 Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for NYSX and 0.15% for QUS.
Find the right allocation for NYSX and QUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer