NYSX vs. IQM
NYSX (Global X NYSE 100 ETF) and IQM (Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. NYSX is passively managed, while IQM is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NYSX charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IQM.
Performance
NYSX vs. IQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NYSX
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 11.23%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IQM
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- 38.49%
- 6M
- 34.62%
- 1Y
- 72.20%
- 3Y*
- 37.11%
- 5Y*
- 21.93%
- 10Y*
- —
NYSX vs. IQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NYSX Global X NYSE 100 ETF | 34.86% |
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | 37.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between NYSX and IQM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NYSX vs. IQM — Risk / Return Rank
NYSX
IQM
NYSX vs. IQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NYSE 100 ETF (NYSX) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NYSX | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 17.95 | 0.95 | +17.00 |
Drawdowns
NYSX vs. IQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NYSX drawdown since its inception was -3.46%, smaller than the maximum IQM drawdown of -44.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYSX and IQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NYSX | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.46% | -44.91% | +41.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -1.57% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -12.24% | +11.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.49% | — |
Volatility
NYSX vs. IQM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NYSX | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.44% | 28.28% | -6.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.44% | 28.90% | -7.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.44% | 30.71% | -9.27% |
NYSX vs. IQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
NYSX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IQM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
NYSX vs. IQM - Dividend Comparison
Neither NYSX nor IQM has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.01% |
NYSX Global X NYSE 100 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NYSX and IQM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NYSX is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NYSX is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IQM.
NYSX and IQM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for NYSX and 0.50% for IQM.
Find the right allocation for NYSX and IQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer