PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NYM vs. ZMUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NYM vs. ZMUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF (NYM) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NYM achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than ZMUN's 1.57% return.


NYM

1D
0.04%
1M
0.48%
YTD
1.43%
6M
1.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZMUN

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.21%
YTD
1.57%
6M
1.86%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NYM vs. ZMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NYM and ZMUN is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NYM vs. ZMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF (NYM) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NYM vs. ZMUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NYMZMUNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.63

6.46

-4.83

Drawdowns

NYM vs. ZMUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NYM drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, which is greater than ZMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYM and ZMUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NYMZMUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-0.09%

-1.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.02%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.42%

-0.01%

-0.41%

Volatility

NYM vs. ZMUN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NYMZMUNDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06%

0.54%

+1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.06%

0.54%

+1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.06%

0.54%

+1.52%

NYM vs. ZMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

NYM has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than ZMUN's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

NYM vs. ZMUN - Dividend Comparison

NYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than ZMUN's 2.28% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


NYM and ZMUN have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NYM is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NYM is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZMUN.

ZMUN has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 1.73% for NYM.

They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for NYM and 0.30% for ZMUN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NYM and ZMUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer