NYM vs. FWD
NYM (AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF) and FWD (AB Disruptors ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NYM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while FWD is a Global Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. Both are actively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NYM charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FWD.
Performance
NYM vs. FWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NYM achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than FWD's 40.11% return.
NYM
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FWD
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 14.15%
- YTD
- 40.11%
- 6M
- 39.78%
- 1Y
- 75.95%
- 3Y*
- 39.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NYM vs. FWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NYM AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.43% | 0.41% |
FWD AB Disruptors ETF | 40.11% | -3.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between NYM and FWD is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NYM vs. FWD — Risk / Return Rank
NYM
FWD
NYM vs. FWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF (NYM) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NYM | FWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.63 | 1.67 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
NYM vs. FWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NYM drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum FWD drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYM and FWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NYM | FWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -29.02% | +27.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -0.27% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.42% | -4.06% | +3.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.66% | — |
Volatility
NYM vs. FWD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NYM | FWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06% | 24.15% | -22.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.06% | 24.72% | -22.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.06% | 24.72% | -22.66% |
NYM vs. FWD - Expense Ratio Comparison
NYM has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than FWD's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
NYM vs. FWD - Dividend Comparison
NYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than FWD's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FWD AB Disruptors ETF | 0.08% | 0.11% | 1.89% |
NYM AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.73% | 0.49% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NYM and FWD have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NYM is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NYM is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FWD.
NYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.08% for FWD.
NYM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while FWD is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for NYM and 0.65% for FWD.
Find the right allocation for NYM and FWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer