NYM vs. TAFM
NYM (AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF) and TAFM (AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds from AllianceBernstein. Both are actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NYM charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for TAFM.
Performance
NYM vs. TAFM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NYM achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than TAFM's 1.91% return.
NYM
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TAFM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 2.26%
- 1Y
- 7.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NYM vs. TAFM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NYM AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.43% | 0.41% |
TAFM AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.91% | 0.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between NYM and TAFM is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NYM vs. TAFM — Risk / Return Rank
NYM
TAFM
NYM vs. TAFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF (NYM) and AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF (TAFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NYM | TAFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.63 | 0.84 | +0.78 |
Drawdowns
NYM vs. TAFM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NYM drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum TAFM drawdown of -4.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYM and TAFM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NYM | TAFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -4.74% | +2.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -0.36% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.42% | -0.95% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.75% | — |
Volatility
NYM vs. TAFM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NYM | TAFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06% | 3.22% | -1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.06% | 4.95% | -2.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.06% | 4.95% | -2.89% |
NYM vs. TAFM - Expense Ratio Comparison
NYM has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than TAFM's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
NYM vs. TAFM - Dividend Comparison
NYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than TAFM's 3.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NYM AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.73% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TAFM AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF | 3.64% | 3.51% | 3.35% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NYM and TAFM have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NYM is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NYM is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for TAFM.
TAFM has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 1.73% for NYM.
Their fees differ too: 0.27% for NYM and 0.28% for TAFM.
Find the right allocation for NYM and TAFM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer