NYM vs. IYW
NYM (AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF) and IYW (iShares U.S. Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NYM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while IYW is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index. NYM is actively managed, while IYW is passively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NYM charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IYW.
Performance
NYM vs. IYW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NYM achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than IYW's 21.96% return.
NYM
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IYW
- 1D
- -3.91%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 21.96%
- 6M
- 20.43%
- 1Y
- 47.04%
- 3Y*
- 32.10%
- 5Y*
- 20.32%
- 10Y*
- 25.94%
NYM vs. IYW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NYM AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.55% | 0.47% |
IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF | 21.96% | 0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between NYM and IYW is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NYM vs. IYW — Risk / Return Rank
NYM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IYW
NYM vs. IYW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF (NYM) and iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NYM | IYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.65 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.46 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NYM vs. IYW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NYM drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum IYW drawdown of -81.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYM and IYW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NYM | IYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -81.90% | +80.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -6.35% | +6.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.40% | -34.59% | +34.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.57% | — |
Volatility
NYM vs. IYW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NYM | IYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03% | 22.34% | -20.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.03% | 26.24% | -24.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.03% | 25.26% | -23.23% |
NYM vs. IYW - Expense Ratio Comparison
NYM has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than IYW's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
NYM vs. IYW - Dividend Comparison
NYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than IYW's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF | 0.11% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.34% | 0.50% | 0.31% | 0.56% | 0.72% | 0.92% | 0.82% | 1.14% | 1.12% |
NYM AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.73% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NYM and IYW have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NYM is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NYM is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IYW.
NYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.11% for IYW.
NYM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while IYW is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for NYM and 0.38% for IYW.
Find the right allocation for NYM and IYW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer